-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chunks cannot be re-used across multiple GetMatchedRowsAndPtrs
calls
#48082
Labels
affects-6.5
This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.1
This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.5
This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions.
severity/major
sig/execution
SIG execution
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
type/performance
type/regression
Comments
YangKeao
added
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
affects-6.5
This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.1
This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions.
sig/execution
SIG execution
labels
Oct 30, 2023
13 tasks
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
may-affects-5.3
This bug maybe affects 5.3.x versions.
may-affects-5.4
This bug maybe affects 5.4.x versions.
may-affects-6.1
may-affects-7.5
labels
Oct 30, 2023
wshwsh12
added
affects-7.5
This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions.
and removed
may-affects-5.3
This bug maybe affects 5.3.x versions.
may-affects-5.4
This bug maybe affects 5.4.x versions.
may-affects-6.1
labels
Oct 30, 2023
So why does ARM suffer much more compared with x86? |
This was referenced Oct 30, 2023
@winoros X86 uses v6.1, the bug code does not exist. |
lcwangchao
pushed a commit
to lcwangchao/tidb
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2023
13 tasks
😂 Reasonable! |
/type regression |
Regression Analysis |
/type performance |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
affects-6.5
This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.1
This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions.
affects-7.5
This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions.
severity/major
sig/execution
SIG execution
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
type/performance
type/regression
Bug Report
Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!
1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)
Run the benchmark
BenchmarkHashJoinExec
2. What did you expect to see? (Required)
Allocating chunks will not cost too much resources.
3. What did you see instead (Required)
Allocating chunks takes a large percent of the total profiling.
Ref: #41081.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: