Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: refactoring the 'replace' implementation, remove its dependency of batch checker #12319

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2019

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Code refactor.
Batch check should be removed, as I've said in #12108

What is changed and how it works?

Don't use batch checker in 'replace'

Check List

Tests

  • No code

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Release note

  • Write release note for bug-fix or new feature.

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao added type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. sig/execution SIG execution labels Sep 23, 2019
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

PTAL @lysu @jackysp

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12319 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master     #12319   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   81.1011%   81.1011%           
===========================================
  Files           454        454           
  Lines         99329      99329           
===========================================
  Hits          80557      80557           
  Misses        12960      12960           
  Partials       5812       5812

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao requested review from lysu and jackysp and removed request for lysu September 23, 2019 11:46
Copy link
Member

@jackysp jackysp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jackysp jackysp added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 23, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@lysu lysu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lysu lysu added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 24, 2019
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 24, 2019

Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for 12307

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 24, 2019

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot sre-bot merged commit 31681b7 into pingcap:master Sep 24, 2019
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the replace-batch-check branch September 24, 2019 08:24
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 24, 2019

cherry pick to release-3.1 failed

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 24, 2019

cherry pick to release-3.0 failed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/execution SIG execution status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants