-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
executor: fix unexpected error in union stmt. (#16073) #16137
Conversation
Signed-off-by: sre-bot <sre-bot@pingcap.com>
/run-all-tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please resolve the conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
Your auto merge job has been accepted, waiting for 16138, 16003, 16141, 16146, 16142, 16139 |
/run-all-tests |
cherry-pick #16073 to release-3.0
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #15790
Problem Summary: Union stmt will make some warning as error unexpected.
What is changed and how it works?
What's Changed: Set the
StatementContext
inUnion
stmt the same asSelect
stmt.How it Works:
Related changes
Check List
Tests
Release note
Make the union statement behavior is same as select statement.