Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work on a partition table when index merge is used #31025

Closed

Conversation

guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge commented Dec 26, 2021

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge shaoge1994@163.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #31024

Problem Summary: just as #31024 said.

What is changed and how it works?

Related to #14921 and #21148.

We need to add extraPIDColumnIndex when build final TableReader for IndexMerge, just like #21148 did.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work on a partition table when IndexMerge is used

…index merge is used

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • mjonss
  • tiancaiamao

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 26, 2021
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/cc @tiancaiamao

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge changed the title fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work on a partition table when IndexMerge is used fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work when IndexMerge is used Dec 26, 2021
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-check_title

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
…aoge/tidb into fix_index_merge_on_part_not_block
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

…able when index merge is used

Signed-off-by: guo-shaoge <shaoge1994@163.com>
@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge changed the title fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work when IndexMerge is used executor: fix bug that pessimistic lock doesn't work on a partition table when index merge is used Dec 26, 2021
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-check_title

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 26, 2021

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu added the type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. label Dec 27, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm planning to fix partition table lock issue using alternative way #30732

The current extraPIDColumn way is buggy and I've abandoned it, see #28666 for another fix on UnionScan

This PR still looks good to me because it add a test and is helpful to prevent regression at least.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Dec 27, 2021
@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-unit-test
/run-check_dev_2

@guo-shaoge
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Guess it's ok to wait for the final fix instead of this temporary fix.

Copy link
Contributor

@mjonss mjonss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

This will fix the issue in static prune mode.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jan 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 6, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@guo-shaoge: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge closed this Jan 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pessimistic lock doesn't work on a partition table when index merge is used
6 participants