-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lightning: refactor for reuse in load data part4 #42727
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
|
||
// CollectLocalDuplicateRows collect duplicate keys from local db. We will store the duplicate keys which | ||
// may be repeated with other keys in local data source. | ||
func (local *DupeController) CollectLocalDuplicateRows(ctx context.Context, tbl table.Table, tableName string, opts *encode.SessionOptions) (hasDupe bool, err error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved from local
backend
/retest |
/run-integration-br-test |
2 similar comments
/run-integration-br-test |
/run-integration-br-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
13 / 28 files viewed
// NewDuplicateManager creates a new DuplicateManager. | ||
func NewDuplicateManager( | ||
// NewDupeDetector creates a new DupeDetector. | ||
func NewDupeDetector( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also cc @gozssky
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
/run-integration-br-test |
3 similar comments
/run-integration-br-test |
/run-integration-br-test |
/run-integration-br-test |
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/test check_dev_2 |
@D3Hunter: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test check-dev2 |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/retest |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: b67374e
|
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
@D3Hunter: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #40499
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
split data into engines/chunks
andlocal backend
independent on lightning config, rename some configs to better reflect its meaning and add comments.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.