-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lightning: refactor to reuse in load data part 5 #42856
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/retest |
/run-integration-br-test |
// ClosedEngine represents a closed engine, allowing ingestion into the target. | ||
// This type is goroutine safe: you can share an instance and execute any method | ||
// anywhere. | ||
type ClosedEngine struct { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved to below where its methods are defined
/retest |
/run-integration-br-test |
3 similar comments
/run-integration-br-test |
/run-integration-br-test |
/run-integration-br-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
14 / 34 files viewed
|
||
// CheckDiskQuota verifies if the total engine file size is below the given | ||
// quota. If the quota is exceeded, this method returns an array of engines, | ||
// which after importing can decrease the total size below quota. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How can we use inProgressLargeEngines
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
didn't look in detail, just copied out
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 4f784fd
|
/retest |
3 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
@D3Hunter: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #40499
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
noop
backend. removeLocalEngineWriter
wrapper.Check List
Tests
no code logic change, will use existing ut and Integration test
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.