-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
external engine: support concurrent read and split into smaller data #47510
external engine: support concurrent read and split into smaller data #47510
Conversation
Hi @lance6716. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-br-integration-test |
@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #47510 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.1485% 75.0182% +2.8696%
================================================
Files 1353 1395 +42
Lines 401168 408042 +6874
================================================
+ Hits 289437 306106 +16669
+ Misses 92480 82124 -10356
- Partials 19251 19812 +561
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
) error { | ||
// estimate we will open at most 1000 files, so if e.dataFiles is small we can | ||
// try to concurrently process ranges. | ||
concurrency := int(MergeSortOverlapThreshold) / len(e.dataFiles) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Set a lower/upper limit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: lance6716 <lance6716@gmail.com>
/test pull-br-integration-test |
@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
return errors.Trace(e.iter.Close()) | ||
} | ||
// Close implements common.Engine. | ||
func (e *Engine) Close() error { return nil } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doube confirm, external engine close do not need release any resource, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the rest lgtm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, local engine need to close its pebble DB. And before this PR external engine holds an iterator member that needs to be closed, but in this PR the iterator becomes a local variable that closed in line 144.
/retest |
@lance6716: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Benjamin2037, tangenta, wjhuang2016, YuJuncen The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here |
@lance6716: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #45719
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.