*: add ctx parameter to infoschema TableByID

[lance6716]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #50959

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

In infoschema v1, all schema meta are in-memory, so TableByName are fast enough.
In infoschema v2, there may be cache miss and loading from remote network, that could be slower.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @lance6716. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-08-09 07:53:51.937807262 +0000 UTC m=+597761.804906345: ☑️ agreed by hawkingrei.
• 2024-08-09 07:57:45.254662271 +0000 UTC m=+597995.121761358: ☑️ agreed by Leavrth.

[easonn7]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: easonn7, hawkingrei, Leavrth, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Leavrth,hawkingrei,tangenta]
• br/OWNERS [Leavrth]
• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [tangenta]
• pkg/domain/OWNERS [tangenta]
• pkg/infoschema/OWNERS [tangenta]
• pkg/planner/OWNERS [hawkingrei]
• pkg/session/OWNERS [easonn7]
• pkg/statistics/OWNERS [hawkingrei]
• pkg/table/OWNERS [tangenta]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.87629% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.3543%. Comparing base (29122de) to head (161b9df).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #55329        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8172%   75.3543%   +2.5371%     
================================================
  Files          1570       1570                
  Lines        439591     440743      +1152     
================================================
+ Hits         320098     332119     +12021     
+ Misses        99757      88069     -11688     
- Partials      19736      20555       +819     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	50.1161% <64.9484%> (?)
unit	71.7976% <95.8762%> (-0.0609%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9567% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	63.0178% <66.6666%> (+17.1356%)	⬆️

[tiprow]

@lance6716: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow	8830471	link	true	/test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.