-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix inconsistent result before deleting some rows #6133
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/cc @windtalker /cc @ywqzzy |
@xzhangxian1008: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: /cc. Note that only pingcap members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @SeaRise |
@@ -240,7 +242,8 @@ struct AssociativeOperationImpl<Op, 1> | |||
|
|||
inline UInt8 apply(size_t i) const | |||
{ | |||
return vec[i]; | |||
// Searching keyword "cast_bool_reason" in this file to get the reason for static_cast<bool> | |||
return static_cast<bool>(vec[i]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we can change the return type of apply
to bool?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we can change the return type of
apply
to bool?
okk
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-all-tests |
@windtalker: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: b3fd8cf
|
@xzhangxian1008: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6139. |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6140. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6141. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6142. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6143. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6144. |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6145. |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #6127
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note