Fix Java interoperability issues with RuleId and RuleSetId
#2042
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s. Those classes were defined as value classes in `0.49.0` and `0.49.1`. Although the classes were marked with `@JvmInline` it seems that it is not possible to uses those classes from Java base API Consumers like Spotless. The classes have now been replaced with data classes. Closes #2041
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fix Java interoperability issues with
RuleIdandRuleSetIdclasses. Those classes were defined as value classes in0.49.0and0.49.1. Although the classes were marked with@JvmInlineit seems that it is not possible to uses those classes from Java base API Consumers like Spotless. The classes have now been replaced with data classes.Closes #2041
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdis updatedIn case of adding a new rule: