We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#799 can cause different results than regular ClojureScript. For example: (integer? 1.1e22) returns true in Planck but false in regular ClojureScript.
(integer? 1.1e22)
true
false
The intent of #799 was to be an optimization, not change semantics or create inconsistencies with regular ClojureScript.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
integer? predicate differs from ClojureScript
d9c9438
Fixes #1036
integer? predicate differs from ClojureScript (#1037)
5a76879
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
#799 can cause different results than regular ClojureScript. For example:
(integer? 1.1e22)
returnstrue
in Planck butfalse
in regular ClojureScript.The intent of #799 was to be an optimization, not change semantics or create inconsistencies with regular ClojureScript.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: