Add stc example

[znhocn]

No description provided.

[zerog2k]

@znhocn
regarding the stc specific headers, I wonder if using a different declaration format would make it easier for editors like vscode to manage c intellisense better. I think this worked better for me
https://github.com/zerog2k/stc_diyclock/blob/master/src/stc15.h

e.g.
using

__sfr __at 0x12 REG_FOO;

instead of

SFR(REG_FOO, 0x12);

Not sure which is the preferred way, but I think for some reason vscode doesnt like these SFR/SBIT/etc macro style for discovering declarations of sfrs, etc.

[zerog2k]

well disregard last comment, I am not sure that vscode understands __sfr/__sbit syntax either...

[znhocn]

@zerog2k
I think VSCode understands the __sfr/__sbit syntax. I tried it and there is no error.

There are two syntaxes __sfr/__sbit and SFR()/SBIT() in the header file provided by SDCC.

C:\Users\<name>\.platformio\packages\toolchain-sdcc\include\mcs51\

I am not sure which syntax is better.

Why do I use SFR()/SBIT() syntax ?
Because it's easier to modify from the STC original header.

STC Original Header:

sfr ACC         =   0xE0;
sfr B           =   0xF0;
sfr PSW         =   0xD0;
sbit CY         =   PSW^7;
sbit AC         =   PSW^6;
sbit F0         =   PSW^5;

sfr P4          =   0xC0;
sbit P40        =   P4^0;
sbit P41        =   P4^1;
sbit P42        =   P4^2;
sbit P43        =   P4^3;

The STC original header is used in the keil compiler and cannot be used in SDCC.

[ivankravets]

Thanks!