Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Correct schema for list.sum #16483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2024
Merged

fix: Correct schema for list.sum #16483

merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2024

Conversation

ritchie46
Copy link
Member

fixes #16467

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels May 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.44%. Comparing base (019dfe8) to head (a378e5f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16483      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.45%   81.44%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1409     1409              
  Lines      184961   184961              
  Branches     2978     2978              
==========================================
- Hits       150656   150634      -22     
- Misses      33784    33806      +22     
  Partials      521      521              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 6d9f11f into main May 25, 2024
27 checks passed
@ritchie46 ritchie46 deleted the type branch May 25, 2024 09:52
Wouittone pushed a commit to Wouittone/polars that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression: list.sum() inside WhenThen now returns a list
1 participant