Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Flaky parametric parquet test #19393

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

coastalwhite
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Oct 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.18%. Comparing base (8a76dad) to head (cf83404).
Report is 70 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19393      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.24%   80.18%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1523     1527       +4     
  Lines      209545   210286     +741     
  Branches     2434     2440       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits       168148   168624     +476     
- Misses      40842    41106     +264     
- Partials      555      556       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 16a0bac into pola-rs:main Oct 23, 2024
13 checks passed
@coastalwhite coastalwhite deleted the fix/flaky-pq-test branch October 23, 2024 13:07
@c-peters c-peters added the accepted Ready for implementation label Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Ready for implementation fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants