Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Secretary Program #347
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Secretary Program #347
Changes from 32 commits
939392f
acd23f2
7d03cac
1c4659b
188759e
154efb5
bea78a3
c203940
334c35c
482d0be
d7d4b87
2e0968a
572d398
09d317c
4e5116b
365d3c5
600d2c2
e884c30
bcd0a17
47ed39e
7b0064a
bdbc39b
ef75bf7
86d489f
313bb8c
d34fcb2
5722c25
b3a82cf
daca216
f8ab6a1
95a2cfb
c32eb13
51b94ef
eaaab37
ec53bb8
906bc10
1b1e81f
d4dac6f
02f8a49
a80a668
1962aef
fe184d9
53e60a6
fd82ec2
b34d4b1
112355e
d1f1d52
4c51096
d63cbd1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be the fellowship interior account, because the secretary should be paid by the same account. Or we move some funds.
@joepetrowski @muharem WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe better separate account for a separate accounting. But can be funded from the fellowship sub treasury. No strong opinion. Let's hear Joe opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we control the account using a fellowship proposal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are the secretaries only for the Fellowship? I thought the program was meant to include secretaries for other collectives as well. If it's just for the Fellowship, then yeah we should just pay them from the Fellowship salary account. But if it's meant to serve others, then I think they can have their own sub-treasury and make proposals for funding to the collectives that they provide secretary services for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the current idea is to enable the secretary collective for the technical fellowship for now until more ideas and participants are clearer, rather than having a tresury implementation for just one member. The salary payout account can be changed to the technical fellowship interior account IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Doordashcon what do you mean?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@joepetrowski highlighted that using the Fellowship Salary account would be a wrong direction because of needing migration later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not the "wrong" direction, it's a choice. I see two solutions:
Secretary
within Ranked Collective (it doesn't need to be called that in the pallet, could even be a rank 10 for example and the origins are configured to treat that as special);In the case of (1), it would naturally just use the specific collective's sub-treasury. In the case of (2), each collective that the Secretary collective serves would have to chip in funds to pay for the Secretary collective's services.
The only thing that is wrong IMO is to make one Secretary collective for every other collective (effectively halving the total number of collectives that the chain can support).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the clarification, @muharem suggested we don't need the Tresury implementation, the Secretary Salary account can be funded using the Technical fellowship sub-treasury.
When more members join who perform operations for other collectives, those collectives can also fund the Salary account using their respective sub-tresuries, a blocker to this might be the refusal of those collectives to comply.
But a need for another Secretary member would have to arise before considering adding another member to the collective.
We won't have a Secretary collective for every other collective, just the one and add more member through the demand for another that serves a seperate collective.
I hope I have been able to understand the suggestions clearly so far 🙏.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we do not need a sub treasury to pay salaries or fund the Secretary salary account. The whole Secretary can be setup as ranked collective pallet and salary pallet and can serve later secretaries for all collectives. We can even have a different salary accounts for different secretary ranks if needed later. They can be funded by other collective's sub treasuries or the Polkadot Treasury. We do not need referenda and origins because in all cases right now we just need to check if the account belongs to a certain rank of the collective, no plurality voice needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Weights are still missing.