Add opdevnet to integrations package #243
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple changes across various files, primarily focusing on configuration adjustments, code simplifications, and the introduction of new functionalities. Key updates include modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
joshklop
force-pushed
the
joshklop.add-opdevnet-to-integrations
branch
7 times, most recently
from
7cddabd to
f3db191
Compare
joshklop
force-pushed
the
joshklop.add-opdevnet-to-integrations
branch
from
28b96e6 to
f3f37af
Compare
joshklop
force-pushed
the
joshklop.add-opdevnet-to-integrations
branch
from
f3f37af to
3ca6bb6
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 27
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (30)
x/rollup/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
18-21: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the AccountKeeper interface.The new
AccountKeeperinterface is well-defined and follows Go conventions. It provides methods for creating and setting accounts, which aligns well with its name and purpose.Consider adding a comment above the
AccountKeeperinterface to describe its purpose, similar to the comment above theBankKeeperinterface. This would improve code documentation and maintainability. For example:// AccountKeeper defines the expected account keeper interface used in the x/rollup module type AccountKeeper interface { // ... existing methods ... }
Line range hint
1-21: Summary: New AccountKeeper interface enhances module capabilitiesThe addition of the
AccountKeeperinterface complements the existingBankKeeperinterface, potentially allowing for more comprehensive account management within the x/rollup module. This change appears to be part of expanding the functionality of the module.Ensure that the implementation of this new interface is consistent with the module's overall architecture and that it integrates well with existing components. Consider updating any relevant documentation or README files to reflect these new capabilities.
monogen/cmd/main.go (1)
Line range hint
41-43: Consider logging errors before exitingThe error logging using
fmt.Fprintfhas been removed. While the context is still being canceled, the error message is no longer being printed to stderr.Consider adding error logging before exiting to help with debugging and troubleshooting. You could use a logging library or simply print to stderr. For example:
if err := rootCmd.ExecuteContext(ctx); err != nil { cancel() // cancel is not called on os.Exit, we have to call it manually + fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "Error: %v\n", err) os.Exit(1) //nolint:gocritic // Doesn't recognize that cancel() is called. }monogen/monogen.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-40: Summary: Introduction of ETH alongside stake tokenThe changes in this script reflect a significant shift in the token economy of the system:
- Genesis account funding now includes both ETH and stake tokens.
- The minimum gas price is now denominated in ETH instead of stake.
These modifications suggest a move towards a dual-token system or potentially transitioning to ETH as the primary token. While the changes themselves are straightforward and don't introduce any apparent issues, they represent a fundamental alteration to the economic model of the chain.
It's crucial to ensure that these changes are intentional and align with the broader project goals. Additionally, you may want to review other parts of the codebase to ensure consistency with this new token approach.
x/rollup/tx/internal/gas.go (2)
58-61: LGTM with a minor suggestion: String method is well-implemented.The
Stringmethod correctly returns a formatted string indicating 0 gas consumed, which is consistent with the infinite gas concept. The string format provides clear information about the gas meter type and consumption.Consider using a constant for the gas meter name to improve maintainability:
+const freeInfiniteGasMeterName = "FreeInfiniteGasMeter" func (g *freeInfiniteGasMeter) String() string { - return fmt.Sprintf("FreeInfiniteGasMeter:\n consumed: %d", 0) + return fmt.Sprintf("%s:\n consumed: %d", freeInfiniteGasMeterName, 0) }
1-61: Consider adding comments to all exported methods.While the existing comments for
NewFreeInfiniteGasMeterandGasConsumedToLimitprovide valuable context, adding brief comments to all exported methods would further improve code readability and maintainability. This is especially important for public APIs.Consider adding comments to the following methods:
GasConsumedGasRemainingLimitConsumeGasRefundGasIsPastLimitIsOutOfGasStringExample for
GasConsumed:// GasConsumed returns the gas consumed from the GasMeter, which is always 0 for freeInfiniteGasMeter. func (g *freeInfiniteGasMeter) GasConsumed() storetypes.Gas { return 0 }e2e/url/url.go (2)
Line range hint
114-116: Address TODO comment inIsReachablemethodThere's a TODO comment suggesting the use of
op-service/backoffwhen upgrading to the latest OP stack version. It might be worth creating a task to track this upgrade and implement the suggested change when appropriate.Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO item?
Line range hint
117-117: Consider making backoff time configurableThe
IsReachablemethod uses a hardcoded backoff time of 1 second. To improve flexibility, consider making this value configurable, either as a parameter to the method or as a configurable constant.Here's a suggested modification to make the backoff time configurable:
-func (u *URL) IsReachable(ctx context.Context) bool { +func (u *URL) IsReachable(ctx context.Context, backoffTime time.Duration) bool { // TODO Use op-service/backoff when we upgrade to latest OP stack version. // Ideally, we would accept a backoff timer. That would give the caller the opportunity // to use the same backoff timer for a single address. This is probably overkill, // especially since this is only used in for e2e testing purposes. - backoffTimer := backoff.NewBackoff("", func(_ string, _ ...any) {}, time.Second) + backoffTimer := backoff.NewBackoff("", func(_ string, _ ...any) {}, backoffTime) var d net.Dialer for ctx.Err() == nil { conn, err := d.DialContext(ctx, "tcp", u.Host())This change allows callers to specify their preferred backoff time, with the option to use a default value if needed.
.golangci.yaml (1)
36-39: LGTM: Quote style change for consistency.The change from single quotes to double quotes for the ignored numbers is a good practice for maintaining consistency in YAML files.
Consider reviewing the entire file to ensure all string values use double quotes for consistency.
x/rollup/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1)
122-146: LGTM: MockAccountKeeper methods are correctly implemented.The NewAccountWithAddress and SetAccount methods are properly implemented following gomock conventions. They correctly mock the expected behavior of the AccountKeeper interface.
Consider renaming the parameters in the method signatures from
arg0andarg1to more descriptive names for better readability. For example:func (m *MockAccountKeeper) NewAccountWithAddress(ctx context.Context, addr types.AccAddress) types.AccountI { // ... } func (m *MockAccountKeeper) SetAccount(ctx context.Context, account types.AccountI) { // ... }This change would make the code more self-documenting without affecting functionality.
x/rollup/tests/integration/rollup_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-190: Summary of changes and potential impact.The changes in this file focus on removing the
FromAddressfield fromMsgApplyL1Txsinstances. While these modifications simplify the message structure, it's crucial to ensure that this refactoring doesn't inadvertently affect the system's security or functionality.Consider the following:
- Update the documentation for
MsgApplyL1Txsto reflect this change in structure.- Review and update any middleware or handlers that previously relied on the
FromAddressfield.- Ensure that the removal of this field doesn't impact any authorization or validation checks in the system.
- Update any client-side code or APIs that might be constructing these messages.
These steps will help maintain the consistency and reliability of the system while benefiting from the simplified message structure.
go.mod (1)
Line range hint
427-429: Go version discrepancy: Align go and toolchain versions.There's a slight discrepancy between the specified Go version and the toolchain version:
go 1.22.0 toolchain go1.22.2While this shouldn't cause immediate issues, it's generally better to keep these versions aligned. Consider updating the go version to 1.22.2 to match the toolchain, or provide a rationale for keeping them different.
x/rollup/tx/helpers/decode.go (1)
22-32: Add unit tests for theDecodemethodTo ensure the robustness of the
Decodemethod, please add unit tests covering:
- Successful decoding with each decoder (
authTxDecoderandrolluptx.DepositDecoder).- Handling of decoding failures when input cannot be decoded by any decoders.
Would you like assistance in writing unit tests for the
Decodemethod?x/rollup/tx/helpers/ante.go (1)
30-43: Ensure proper handling of unknown transaction typesThe
AnteHandlemethod uses a type switch to handle different transaction types. The default case handles transactions not of type*rolluptx.Depositby delegating toa.authAnte. Since the Cosmos SDK does not export its default transaction type, this approach is acceptable. However, ensure that all expected transaction types are properly handled and consider logging or monitoring unhandled transaction types for future debugging.x/rollup/tx/deposit.go (2)
28-33: Typo in comment: 'propoer' should be 'proper'There's a minor typographical error in the comment. Correcting it improves readability.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-// also add an sdktypes.PreBlocker to check that these are in the propoer order. +// also add an sdktypes.PreBlocker to check that these are in the proper order.
28-33: Offer assistance with implementing the TODOThe TODO indicates plans to split deposits into three types and add a
sdktypes.PreBlockerfor ordering. Addressing this will enhance the code's clarity and functionality.Would you like assistance in implementing these changes or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
integrations/logger.go (2)
9-10: Consider the stability risks of usinggolang.org/x/exp/slogThe code imports the experimental package
golang.org/x/exp/slog. Be aware that experimental packages may change without notice and are not guaranteed to be stable. If possible, consider using a stable logging package to avoid potential future compatibility issues.
33-35: MapTracemethod appropriately or document the behaviorThe
Tracemethod currently maps tol.log.Debug, which might cause loss of logging granularity ifTracemessages are expected to be more verbose thanDebug. If the underlyingl.logsupports aTracelevel, consider using it. Otherwise, mapping toDebugis acceptable, but it's good practice to document this behavior for clarity.engine/signer/signer.go (1)
67-68: Consider parameterizing fee amount and gas limitThe fee amount and gas limit are currently hardcoded to
1,000,000units:txBuilder.SetFeeAmount(sdktypes.NewCoins(sdktypes.NewCoin(types.ETH, sdkmath.NewInt(1000000)))) txBuilder.SetGasLimit(1000000)For greater flexibility and maintainability, consider making these values configurable or defining them as constants.
opdevnet/secrets.go (3)
64-98: Enhancement: Wrap errors with context for better debuggingWhen retrieving private keys, errors are returned directly without additional context. Consider wrapping these errors with descriptive messages to aid in debugging.
For example:
- if err != nil { - return nil, err - } + if err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get private key for Deployer: %w", err) + }Repeat this pattern for all accounts to provide clear error messages.
135-140: Clarification: Add comments to explain private key encoding logicThe
EncodePrivKeyfunction pads the private key bytes to ensure a fixed length of 32 bytes. Adding a comment to explain this logic would improve code readability and help future developers understand the intention.For example:
func EncodePrivKey(priv *ecdsa.PrivateKey) hexutil.Bytes { privkey := make([]byte, 32) blob := priv.D.Bytes() + // Left-pad the private key bytes with zeros to ensure 32-byte length copy(privkey[32-len(blob):], blob) return privkey }
179-191: Suggestion: Ensure consistency in the order of addresses returnedThe
All()method returns a slice of all addresses. To avoid potential bugs, ensure that the order of addresses in the slice remains consistent across calls. This can be important if the order is relied upon elsewhere in the codebase.testutils/utils.go (2)
201-203: Improve error message when converting message toAnyfailsConsider enhancing the error message in case
codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(msg)returns an error. Providing more context can aid in debugging and pinpointing the problematic message.Apply this diff to improve the error message:
anyMsg, err := codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(msg) if err != nil { - return nil, fmt.Errorf("new any with value: %v", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to convert message of type %T to Any: %v", msg, err) }
214-216: Enhance error message when marshaling the transaction failsImproving the error message when marshaling the transaction fails can provide better insight during debugging.
Apply this diff to enhance the error message:
txBytes, err := (&sdktx.Tx{ AuthInfo: &sdktx.AuthInfo{ Fee: &sdktx.Fee{}, }, Body: &sdktx.TxBody{ Messages: anys, }, }).Marshal() if err != nil { - return nil, fmt.Errorf("marshal: %v", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal transaction: %v", err) }monogen/monogen.go (2)
6-6: Verify the necessity of the 'os' package importThe standard library package
osis imported at line 6. Ensure that functions from theospackage are used in the code. If not, consider removing the import to keep the code clean.
9-9: Avoid potential confusion with import alias 'cometos'The alias
cometosis very similar to the standardospackage name. This might lead to confusion when reading the code. Consider renaming the alias to something more distinctive, such ascometOSorcmtos.engine/engine.go (4)
Line range hint
80-220: Refactor repetitive error handling inForkchoiceUpdatedV3The
ForkchoiceUpdatedV3method contains multiple instances of repetitive error handling code when retrieving headers and validating block heights. This repetition can make the code harder to maintain and increases the risk of inconsistencies.Consider creating helper functions to handle header retrieval and validation. This will reduce code duplication and improve readability. For example:
func (e *EngineAPI) getHeaderByHash(hash common.Hash) (*monomer.Header, error) { header, err := e.blockStore.HeaderByHash(hash) if errors.Is(err, monomerdb.ErrNotFound) { return nil, engine.InvalidForkChoiceState.With(fmt.Errorf("block not found: %v", hash)) } else if err != nil { return nil, engine.GenericServerError.With(fmt.Errorf("get header by hash: %v", err)) } return header, nil }Then, replace repetitive blocks with calls to this helper function.
Line range hint
290-292: Avoid usingpanicfor error handling inGetPayloadV3In the
GetPayloadV3method, the code usespanicto handle an error when building the block:if err != nil { panic(fmt.Errorf("build block: %v", err)) }Using
paniccan cause the application to crash and is generally discouraged in production code. It is better to return an error to allow the caller to handle it appropriately.Apply this diff to handle the error without panicking:
if err != nil { - panic(fmt.Errorf("build block: %v", err)) + return nil, engine.GenericServerError.With(fmt.Errorf("build block: %v", err)) }
Line range hint
362-362: Address the TODO: Decide on the correctLatestValidHashThere's a TODO comment questioning whether to use the unsafe head instead of
headHeader.Hash:// TODO should we be using unsafe head instead?Clarifying this decision is important for the correctness of the
NewPayloadV3method and ensuring the execution client's view of the latest valid block is accurate.Would you like assistance in determining whether
LatestValidHashshould reference the unsafe head? I can help research this and propose a solution or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
Line range hint
240-275: Ensure thread safety when accessingcurrentPayloadAttributesIn
GetPayloadV3, while there is a read lock (RLock), modifyinge.currentPayloadAttributeswithout a write lock could lead to concurrency issues:// remove payload e.currentPayloadAttributes = nilConsider acquiring a write lock before modifying
e.currentPayloadAttributesto ensure thread safety.- e.lock.RLock() + e.lock.Lock() defer e.lock.Unlock()
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/rollup/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
- .golangci.yaml (2 hunks)
- adapters.go (4 hunks)
- adapters_test.go (0 hunks)
- builder/builder.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/url/url.go (1 hunks)
- engine/engine.go (1 hunks)
- engine/signer/signer.go (2 hunks)
- go.mod (5 hunks)
- integrations/integrations.go (9 hunks)
- integrations/integrations_pkg_test.go (2 hunks)
- integrations/logger.go (1 hunks)
- monogen/cmd/main.go (1 hunks)
- monogen/monogen.go (5 hunks)
- monogen/monogen.sh (2 hunks)
- monogen/monogen_test.go (2 hunks)
- opdevnet/README.md (1 hunks)
- opdevnet/op.go (1 hunks)
- opdevnet/opdevnet_test.go (1 hunks)
- opdevnet/secrets.go (1 hunks)
- proto/rollup/v1/tx.proto (0 hunks)
- testapp/testapp.go (2 hunks)
- testutils/utils.go (3 hunks)
- x/rollup/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/rollup/tests/integration/rollup_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/tx/deposit.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/tx/helpers/ante.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/tx/helpers/decode.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/tx/internal/README.md (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/tx/internal/gas.go (1 hunks)
- x/rollup/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- adapters_test.go
- proto/rollup/v1/tx.proto
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- opdevnet/README.md
- x/rollup/tx/internal/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (51)
monogen/cmd/main.go (1)
20-20: Verify the impact of the new parameter inmonogen.GenerateAn additional boolean parameter (false) has been added to the
monogen.Generatefunction call. This change might affect the behavior of the Generate function.Please ensure that:
- The
Generatefunction in themonogenpackage has been updated to accept this new parameter.- The impact of this new parameter is well-documented and tested.
To verify the
Generatefunction signature, you can run the following command:monogen/monogen.sh (1)
28-28: LGTM: Enhanced genesis account fundingThe modification to include both ETH and stake tokens in the genesis account funding is a positive change. This update provides more flexibility by supporting multiple token types and aligns well with the subsequent change in gas price currency.
x/rollup/tx/internal/gas.go (9)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name
internalis suitable for implementation details not meant to be directly imported by other packages. The imports are relevant to the implementation of the gas meter.
10-11: LGTM: Empty struct is appropriate for stateless implementation.The
freeInfiniteGasMeterstruct is correctly defined as an empty struct since it doesn't need to maintain any state for its operations.
13-16: LGTM: Constructor function is well-implemented.The
NewFreeInfiniteGasMeterfunction correctly initializes and returns a new instance offreeInfiniteGasMeterthat satisfies thestoretypes.GasMeterinterface.
18-28: LGTM: Gas consumption methods are correctly implemented.Both
GasConsumedandGasConsumedToLimitmethods consistently return 0, aligning with the infinite gas concept. The comment forGasConsumedToLimitprovides valuable context about its usage in panic recovery scenarios.
30-38: LGTM: Remaining gas and limit methods correctly simulate infinite gas.The
GasRemainingandLimitmethods both returnmath.MaxUint64, which effectively simulates an infinite gas supply. This is an appropriate way to represent "infinity" for uint64 values.
40-46: LGTM: Gas consumption and refund methods are correctly implemented as no-ops.The
ConsumeGasandRefundGasmethods are correctly implemented as no-ops, which is consistent with the infinite gas concept. These methods are necessary to satisfy thestoretypes.GasMeterinterface, even though they don't perform any actions in this implementation.
48-56: LGTM: Limit check methods correctly implement infinite gas behavior.The
IsPastLimitandIsOutOfGasmethods consistently returnfalse, which accurately reflects the behavior of an infinite gas meter where the gas limit can never be exceeded.
1-61: LGTM: Overall structure and implementation are well-designed.The file successfully implements all methods required by the
storetypes.GasMeterinterface while consistently maintaining the infinite gas concept. The structure is logical, easy to follow, and all necessary methods are implemented correctly.
1-61: LGTM: Edge cases are inherently handled by the infinite gas concept.The implementation appropriately handles all potential edge cases by design. Since the gas meter simulates infinite gas, there are no error conditions or limits to check against. All methods consistently return fixed values or perform no-ops, which is the correct behavior for this type of gas meter.
e2e/url/url.go (1)
41-41: Improved error message formattingThe change enhances the clarity of the error message by quoting the URL. This is a good improvement as it:
- Increases readability by clearly distinguishing the URL from the rest of the error message.
- Ensures consistent formatting of the URL in the error message.
monogen/monogen_test.go (2)
31-31: Approve change and verify overwrite behaviorThe addition of the new boolean parameter to the
monogen.Generatefunction is consistent with the previous change.Let's verify if the new parameter affects the overwrite behavior:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of monogen.Generate to understand # how the new boolean parameter affects the overwrite behavior. # Search for the monogen.Generate function definition ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func Generate(ctx context.Context, appDirPath string, modulePath string, testName string, overwrite bool, $newParam bool) error { $$$ }' # Search for any conditions related to overwriting within the Generate function rg --type go 'func Generate\(' -A 50 | rg 'overwrite|refuse'Please review the results of this verification to ensure that the overwrite behavior is still correctly implemented with the new parameter.
21-21: Approve change and request documentation for the new parameterThe addition of a new boolean parameter to the
monogen.Generatefunction is noted. This change aligns with the updated function signature mentioned in the summary.Could you please add a comment explaining the purpose of this new boolean parameter? This will help improve the test's readability and maintainability.
Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
All instances of
monogen.Generatehave been successfully updated with the new boolean parameter.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for all occurrences of monogen.Generate function calls # and ensure they have been updated with the new parameter. # Search for monogen.Generate function calls rg --type go 'monogen\.Generate\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all monogen.Generate function calls missing the new boolean parameter. # Pattern to match monogen.Generate calls with exactly 4 parameters (missing the new parameter) ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'monogen.Generate($_, $_, $_, $_)' --countLength of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all monogen.Generate function calls missing the new boolean parameter. # Pattern to match monogen.Generate calls with exactly 4 parameters (missing the new parameter) ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'monogen.Generate($_, $_, $_, $_)' | wc -lLength of output: 75
.golangci.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-135: LGTM: Overall structure and consistency maintained.The changes made to the
.golangci.yamlfile are minimal and focused. They don't significantly alter the linter's behavior, and the file maintains its overall structure and readability. No apparent inconsistencies or issues have been introduced by these changes.
126-127: Approved with a request for clarification on exclusions.The additions of
opdevnet/secrets.gotoexclude-filesandx/rollup/tx/internaltoexclude-dirshave been noted. These exclusions will prevent linting of the specified file and directory.Could you please provide the rationale for excluding these from linting? It's important to ensure that we're not inadvertently hiding potential issues.
To verify the contents and nature of the excluded files, please run the following script:
This script will help us understand the nature of the excluded file and directory, which can inform our decision on whether these exclusions are appropriate.
Also applies to: 131-131
✅ Verification successful
Exclusions Verified and Approved.
The exclusion ofopdevnet/secrets.goand thex/rollup/tx/internaldirectory from linting has been confirmed to be appropriate based on their contents.
opdevnet/secrets.gohandles sensitive operations.x/rollup/tx/internal/gas.gois derived from an external source with necessary modifications.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the excluded file and directory # Check if the secrets file exists and output its first few lines echo "Checking opdevnet/secrets.go:" if [ -f opdevnet/secrets.go ]; then head -n 5 opdevnet/secrets.go else echo "File does not exist" fi # Check the contents of the excluded directory echo -e "\nChecking x/rollup/tx/internal directory:" if [ -d x/rollup/tx/internal ]; then ls -la x/rollup/tx/internal echo -e "\nSample of a random file in the directory:" find x/rollup/tx/internal -type f | shuf -n 1 | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "{}:"; head -n 5 "{}"' else echo "Directory does not exist" fiLength of output: 841
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of all files in the excluded directory without using shuf # Check if the excluded directory exists echo "Checking x/rollup/tx/internal directory:" if [ -d x/rollup/tx/internal ]; then echo "Listing all files in x/rollup/tx/internal:" ls -la x/rollup/tx/internal echo -e "\nDisplaying the first 5 lines of each file in the directory:" for file in x/rollup/tx/internal/*; do if [ -f "$file" ]; then echo -e "\n$file:" head -n 5 "$file" fi done else echo "Directory does not exist" fiLength of output: 1311
opdevnet/opdevnet_test.go (1)
103-104: LGTM! Verify new DefaultMnemonicConfig implementation.The change from
e2eutils.DefaultMnemonicConfig.Secrets()toopdevnet.DefaultMnemonicConfig.Secrets()looks good. This modification appears to be intentional, likely aimed at reducing dependencies on e2e utilities and making the opdevnet package more self-contained.To ensure the correctness of this change, please verify that:
- The
opdevnet.DefaultMnemonicConfigis properly implemented and tested.- The output of
opdevnet.DefaultMnemonicConfig.Secrets()is compatible with the previous implementation.You can run the following script to check the implementation:
opdevnet/op.go (1)
56-56: LGTM. Verify new function behavior and update documentation.The change from
e2eutils.EncodePrivKeyToString(key)toEncodePrivKeyToString(key)looks good. This likely reduces dependencies on thee2eutilspackage.Please ensure that:
- The new
EncodePrivKeyToStringfunction behaves identically to the original one ine2eutils.- Any relevant documentation or comments referencing
e2eutils.EncodePrivKeyToStringare updated.To verify the function's existence and usage, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified dependency reduction. The
e2eutils.EncodePrivKeyToStringdependency has been successfully removed and replaced with the localEncodePrivKeyToStringfunction.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence and usage of EncodePrivKeyToString function rg --type go "func EncodePrivKeyToString" . rg --type go "EncodePrivKeyToString\(" .Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the implementation of EncodePrivKeyToString in the current package cat ./opdevnet/secrets.go | sed -n '/func EncodePrivKeyToString/,/}/p' # Retrieve the implementation of e2eutils.EncodePrivKeyToString if it exists rg --type go 'func EncodePrivKeyToString' ./vendor/e2eutils/ || echo "e2eutils.EncodePrivKeyToString not found"Length of output: 391
x/rollup/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (2)
99-103: LGTM: MockAccountKeeper struct declaration is correct.The MockAccountKeeper struct is properly declared with the necessary fields for the gomock implementation. It follows the same pattern as the existing MockBankKeeper, ensuring consistency in the mocking approach.
110-115: LGTM: NewMockAccountKeeper function is correctly implemented.The NewMockAccountKeeper function properly creates and initializes a new MockAccountKeeper instance. It follows the standard pattern for gomock implementations, ensuring that the mock and its recorder are correctly set up.
integrations/integrations_pkg_test.go (2)
77-77: Verify the impact ofStartCommandHandlerbecoming private and approve error handling improvement.The function
StartCommandHandlerhas been renamed tostartCommandHandler, indicating a change from public to private visibility. This change improves encapsulation but may have broader implications:
- Ensure that no other packages were directly calling
StartCommandHandler. If they were, they need to be updated or the function should remain public.- Update any documentation referring to
StartCommandHandler.The change in error handling syntax from
=to:=is an improvement in idiomatic Go code.The error handling syntax change is approved.
To check for any remaining references to the old public function name, run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the old public function name rg --type go 'StartCommandHandler'If this change is part of a larger refactoring to improve the package's API, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind making this function private.
59-59: Verify the impact of the engine URL change and update documentation.The engine URL has been updated from a Monomer-specific engine to a WebSocket-based engine. This change might have broader implications:
- Ensure that all components expecting to connect to the engine are updated to use the new WebSocket protocol and port.
- Update any relevant documentation or configuration files to reflect this change.
- Verify that the new engine at
ws://127.0.0.1:9000is compatible with the existing system and provides all necessary functionality.To check for any remaining references to the old engine URL or port, run:
Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this change and any specific requirements for the new WebSocket-based engine.
✅ Verification successful
Engine URL update verified successfully.
No references to the old engine URL (
127.0.0.1:8089) ormonomerEngineWSFlagwere found in the codebase. The change tows://127.0.0.1:9000is isolated and does not impact other components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the old engine URL or port rg --type go '127\.0\.0\.1:8089|monomerEngineWSFlag'Length of output: 387
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to search for references to the old engine URL or port rg --type go '127\.0\.0\.1:8089|monomerEngineWSFlag'Length of output: 54
testapp/testapp.go (1)
39-39: LGTM: Import statement for transaction helpers.The addition of the
helperspackage from the rollup module is consistent with the PR objective and suggests an enhancement in transaction handling capabilities.x/rollup/tests/integration/rollup_test.go (2)
74-74: Consistent removal ofFromAddressfield.The removal of the
FromAddressfield here is consistent with the previous change. This suggests an intentional modification across the codebase to simplify theMsgApplyL1Txsstructure.To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check all occurrences of
MsgApplyL1Txsin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Search for all struct initializations of MsgApplyL1Txs rg --type go "MsgApplyL1Txs\{" -A 5 -B 2This will help us verify that the
FromAddressfield has been removed from all initializations ofMsgApplyL1Txsand that no other unexpected changes have been introduced.
68-68: Verify the removal of theFromAddressfield inMsgApplyL1Txs.The
FromAddressfield has been removed from theMsgApplyL1Txsstruct. This change simplifies the message structure, but we need to ensure it doesn't affect the security or functionality of the system.Please confirm:
- Is the sender's address no longer required for this operation?
- How is the sender authenticated or verified now?
- Are there any potential security implications of this change?
To help verify this change, you can run the following script:
This will help us understand how
MsgApplyL1Txsis used throughout the codebase and ensure that this change is consistent with its usage elsewhere.✅ Verification successful
Removal of the
FromAddressfield inMsgApplyL1Txsverified.The
FromAddressfield has been successfully removed from theMsgApplyL1Txsstruct, and all usages have been updated accordingly. No security or functionality issues were detected with this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of MsgApplyL1Txs in the codebase rg --type go "MsgApplyL1Txs" -A 10 -B 2Length of output: 2881
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition of MsgApplyL1Txs and list its fields ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type MsgApplyL1Txs struct { $$$ }' .Length of output: 500
go.mod (3)
18-18: New dependencies added: Verify their necessity and impact.The following new dependencies have been added:
github.com/ethereum-optimism/go-ethereum-hdwallet v0.1.3google.golang.org/protobuf v1.34.2git.luolix.top/go-playground/validator/v10 v10.12.0(indirect)github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid v1.0.3(indirect)These additions seem appropriate for a blockchain-related project. However, please ensure that each new dependency is necessary and consider any potential impact on the project's security and performance.
#!/bin/bash # Verify the usage of new dependencies echo "Checking usage of new dependencies:" rg --type go "ethereum-optimism/go-ethereum-hdwallet" -C 3 rg --type go "google.golang.org/protobuf" -C 3 rg --type go "go-playground/validator" -C 3 rg --type go "hashicorp/go-uuid" -C 3Also applies to: 39-39, 150-150, 197-197
Line range hint
425-425: Custom fork of go-ethereum: Document the rationale.The replace directive has been updated to use a specific commit of a custom fork of go-ethereum:
replace github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum => github.com/joshklop/op-geth v0.0.0-20240515205036-e3b990384a74This change suggests that the project requires custom modifications to the Ethereum client. Please ensure that:
- The reason for using this fork is well-documented in the project.
- There's a plan to keep this fork up-to-date with the upstream repository.
- The specific commit being used is stable and tested.
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of ethereum/go-ethereum in the project echo "Checking usage of ethereum/go-ethereum:" rg --type go "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum" -C 3
103-103: Dependency update: Verify changelog for breaking changes.The
github.com/deckarep/golang-set/v2package has been updated from v2.1.0 to v2.3.0. This minor version update should maintain backwards compatibility, but it's good practice to review the changelog for any potential breaking changes or new features that could benefit the project.x/rollup/tx/helpers/decode.go (1)
1-32: Well-structured implementation of transaction decoderThe implementation of the
TxDecoderand itsDecodemethod effectively handles transaction decoding with a fallback mechanism. The code is clean, follows best practices, and promotes extensibility.x/rollup/tx/deposit.go (2)
41-50:⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential nil pointers in
DepositDecoderIf
proto.Unmarshalfails,depositMsgmight benil, which could lead to a nil pointer dereference when creating theDepositstruct.Apply this diff to ensure
depositMsgis notnilbefore use:func DepositDecoder(txBytes []byte) (sdktypes.Tx, error) { depositMsg := new(types.MsgApplyL1Txs) if err := proto.Unmarshal(txBytes, depositMsg); err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unmarshal proto: %v", err) } + if depositMsg == nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("deposit message is nil after unmarshalling") + } return &Deposit{ Msg: depositMsg, }, nil }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
34-39: Verify the use ofNewFreeInfiniteGasMeterinDepositAnteHandlerThe
DepositAnteHandlersets a free infinite gas meter for transactions of type*Deposit. Ensure that this behavior is intended and doesn't introduce potential security risks, such as allowing unbounded computation without gas limitations.To confirm the usage and assess potential risks, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the use of
NewFreeInfiniteGasMeterinDepositAnteHandler.
The implementation is intentional and restricted to*Deposittransactions, ensuring controlled and secure usage without introducing unbounded computation risks.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of NewFreeInfiniteGasMeter in the codebase. # Test: Ensure that NewFreeInfiniteGasMeter is used appropriately. # Expected: Only intentional and secure usages in controlled contexts. rg --type go 'NewFreeInfiniteGasMeter' -A 5Length of output: 854
engine/signer/signer.go (2)
22-27: Confirm intentional change to secp256k1 private keysThe
Signerstruct and theNewconstructor have been updated to usesecp256k1.PrivKeyinstead ofed25519.PrivKey. This alters the cryptographic algorithm used for signing. Please ensure that this change is intentional and that all other components interacting with theSignerare compatible withsecp256k1.
55-109: Review of the refactoredSignmethodThe
Signmethod now accepts a slice ofproto.Messageand returns abfttypes.Tx. The new implementation correctly constructs and signs the transaction using the provided messages. The error handling is thorough, and the code is clean and well-structured.x/rollup/module.go (3)
43-44: Registration ofProvideCustomGetSigneris correctly integratedThe
appmodule.Registercall now includesProvideCustomGetSigner, which properly integrates the custom signer into the module registration process.
46-53: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUsage of
protov1.MessageNamewithnolintdirectiveThe function
ProvideCustomGetSignerusesprotov1.MessageNamealong with a//nolint:staticcheckdirective due to the constraints mentioned in the comment. While this addresses the immediate issue, consider exploring if the codebase can be updated to usegoogle.golang.org/protobufconsistently to avoid relying onnolintdirectives.To check where
types.MsgApplyL1Txsoriginates and whether it's possible to use the newer protobuf package, run:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `MsgApplyL1Txs` and its protobuf dependencies. rg --type go 'type MsgApplyL1Txs' -A 5
16-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider unifying protobuf imports to prevent type conflicts
The code imports both
github.com/golang/protobuf/proto(aliased asprotov1) andgoogle.golang.org/protobuf/proto. Mixing these protobuf libraries can lead to type incompatibilities and unexpected behavior. It's recommended to use a single protobuf implementation across the codebase to ensure consistency.To identify any potential issues arising from this, you can run the following script:
opdevnet/secrets.go (1)
114-132: Suggestion: Secure handling of private keys inSecretsstructThe
Secretsstruct stores private keys in memory, which could pose security risks if not handled carefully. Ensure that these keys are managed securely, and consider implementing methods to securely wipe them from memory when no longer needed.testutils/utils.go (1)
197-217: Verify all usages ofgenerateSignTxhave been updated to the new signatureThe function
generateSignTxhas been modified to accept a slice ofproto.Messageand return(bfttypes.Tx, error)instead of accepting a*sdktx.Txand returning an error. Please ensure that all calls togenerateSignTxin the codebase have been updated to match this new signature to prevent compilation errors or unexpected behavior.Run the following script to find all usages of
generateSignTxand review their usage:✅ Verification successful
All usages of
generateSignTxhave been updated to the new signature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of `generateSignTx` in the codebase and display their context. # Test: Search for function calls to `generateSignTx`. Expect: All calls use the new signature with msgs []proto.Message. rg --type go -A 2 'generateSignTx\('Length of output: 216
monogen/monogen.go (5)
21-21: Ensure all calls to 'Generate' include the new 'isTest' parameterThe function signature of
Generatehas been updated to include theisTest boolparameter. Verify that all calls toGeneratethroughout the codebase have been updated to include this new parameter to prevent compilation errors.
71-71: Confirm 'addReplaceDirectives' usage with the new 'isTest' parameterThe call to
addReplaceDirectivesnow includes theisTestparameter. Ensure that the function definition and any other calls toaddReplaceDirectivesare updated accordingly. This helps maintain consistency and prevents potential runtime issues.
245-245: Ensure 'addReplaceDirectives' function signature is consistently updatedThe function
addReplaceDirectivesnow accepts theisTest boolparameter. Verify that all invocations of this function across the codebase include the new parameter to maintain consistency and prevent compilation errors.
270-274: Review module replacements pointing to private repositoriesThe
go.modreplacements include modules pointing to private repositories or forks:
github.com/joshklop/go-libp2pgit.luolix.top/joshklop/op-gethEnsure that these replacements are intentional. Using private forks may lead to build failures for other developers who do not have access to these repositories. Consider making these replacements configurable or documenting the requirements for accessing these repositories to avoid integration issues.
236-236:⚠️ Potential issueVerify that 'AddMonomerCommand' retains essential functionalities
The code replaces:
server.AddCommands(rootCmd, app.DefaultNodeHome, newApp, appExport, addModuleInitFlags)with:
integrations.AddMonomerCommand(rootCmd, newApp, app.DefaultNodeHome)Confirm that the new
AddMonomerCommandfunction incorporates all necessary commands and configurations previously provided byserver.AddCommands, especially the omittedappExportandaddModuleInitFlagsparameters. This ensures that command-line functionalities remain intact.integrations/integrations.go (8)
70-89: Function 'AddMonomerCommand' is well-implementedThe
AddMonomerCommandfunction successfully adds the Monomer subcommands to the CLI application. The structure is clear, and the integration with the existing command framework is appropriate.
178-195: Utility function 'readFromFileOrGetDefault' is well-structuredThe
readFromFileOrGetDefaultgeneric function is a clean and efficient way to handle configuration data. It properly handles the cases where a file is provided or a default value needs to be used.
197-288: Function 'startOPDevnet' integrates devnet setup effectivelyThe
startOPDevnetfunction properly configures and runs the OP development network. Error handling is thorough, and the use of helper functions enhances readability.
Line range hint
333-366: Updated 'startInProcess' function accommodates new parameters correctlyThe modifications to
startInProcesseffectively incorporate additional parameters required for Monomer integration. The function maintains clarity and logical flow.
382-401: 'startMonomerNode' initialization is comprehensiveThe
startMonomerNodefunction initializes the Monomer node with all necessary components. Setting the client context and chain ID ensures correct operation.
447-461: App state unmarshalling and genesis configuration are handled properlyThe unmarshal of
appStateJSONintoappStateand the genesis configuration within the node initialization are correctly implemented.
395-401: Verify RPC client initializationEnsure that the RPC client is initialized with the correct listen address and that the client context is properly updated. This guarantees that downstream components interact with the correct RPC server.
451-454:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'engineURL' host is valid before listening
While using
engineURL.Host()innet.Listenis appropriate, consider adding a check to ensure the host is not empty to prevent potential runtime errors.Add a validation step:
if engineURL.Host() == "" { return fmt.Errorf("engine URL host is empty") }
| @@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ address=$(./testappd keys show dummy-account -a --keyring-backend test) | |||
|
|
|||
| # The testapp is ready to run with: | |||
| # ``` | |||
| # ./testappd monomer start --minimum-gas-prices 0.01stake | |||
| # ./testappd monomer start --minimum-gas-prices 0.01ETH | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Gas Price Currency in Test Files
The main change updates the minimum gas price currency from "stake" to "ETH". However, the following test files still use "stake":
monogen/monogen_test.gointegrations/integrations_pkg_test.go
Please ensure that the gas price currency is consistently updated to "ETH" across all configurations, including test files, to maintain consistency and prevent potential issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify intention: Gas price currency change
The change from 'stake' to 'ETH' for minimum gas prices is consistent with the earlier modification to include ETH in genesis funding. This update suggests a shift towards using ETH as the primary token for transaction fees.
While this change appears correct, it represents a significant alteration to the chain's economic model. Please confirm that this modification aligns with the project's intended tokenomics and overall design goals.
To ensure this change is consistent throughout the codebase, you may want to run the following command:
This will help identify any other locations where the minimum gas price might need to be updated for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of minimum gas prices in the codebase
rg --type-add 'go:*.go' --type-add 'toml:*.toml' --type go,toml "minimum.gas.prices"
Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of minimum gas prices in the codebase
rg --type go --type toml "minimum.gas.prices"
Length of output: 288
|
|
||
| // MockAccountKeeper is a mock of AccountKeeper interface. | ||
| type MockAccountKeeper struct { | ||
| ctrl *gomock.Controller | ||
| recorder *MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder is the mock recorder for MockAccountKeeper. | ||
| type MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder struct { | ||
| mock *MockAccountKeeper | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // NewMockAccountKeeper creates a new mock instance. | ||
| func NewMockAccountKeeper(ctrl *gomock.Controller) *MockAccountKeeper { | ||
| mock := &MockAccountKeeper{ctrl: ctrl} | ||
| mock.recorder = &MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder{mock} | ||
| return mock | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // EXPECT returns an object that allows the caller to indicate expected use. | ||
| func (m *MockAccountKeeper) EXPECT() *MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder { | ||
| return m.recorder | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // NewAccountWithAddress mocks base method. | ||
| func (m *MockAccountKeeper) NewAccountWithAddress(arg0 context.Context, arg1 types.AccAddress) types.AccountI { | ||
| m.ctrl.T.Helper() | ||
| ret := m.ctrl.Call(m, "NewAccountWithAddress", arg0, arg1) | ||
| ret0, _ := ret[0].(types.AccountI) | ||
| return ret0 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // NewAccountWithAddress indicates an expected call of NewAccountWithAddress. | ||
| func (mr *MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder) NewAccountWithAddress(arg0, arg1 any) *gomock.Call { | ||
| mr.mock.ctrl.T.Helper() | ||
| return mr.mock.ctrl.RecordCallWithMethodType(mr.mock, "NewAccountWithAddress", reflect.TypeOf((*MockAccountKeeper)(nil).NewAccountWithAddress), arg0, arg1) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // SetAccount mocks base method. | ||
| func (m *MockAccountKeeper) SetAccount(arg0 context.Context, arg1 types.AccountI) { | ||
| m.ctrl.T.Helper() | ||
| m.ctrl.Call(m, "SetAccount", arg0, arg1) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // SetAccount indicates an expected call of SetAccount. | ||
| func (mr *MockAccountKeeperMockRecorder) SetAccount(arg0, arg1 any) *gomock.Call { | ||
| mr.mock.ctrl.T.Helper() | ||
| return mr.mock.ctrl.RecordCallWithMethodType(mr.mock, "SetAccount", reflect.TypeOf((*MockAccountKeeper)(nil).SetAccount), arg0, arg1) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: MockAccountKeeper is Defined but Not Utilized in Tests
It appears that MockAccountKeeper is defined in x/rollup/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go but is not currently used in any test files. This may indicate unnecessary code or a missed opportunity to enhance test coverage.
Recommendations:
- Verify Necessity: Confirm if
MockAccountKeeperis intended for future tests. If so, consider adding a TODO comment to indicate its planned usage. - Remove if Unused: If there are no plans to use
MockAccountKeeper, remove it to maintain codebase cleanliness and avoid confusion.
🔗 Analysis chain
Summary: MockAccountKeeper implementation is correct and consistent.
The addition of the MockAccountKeeper to this generated file is well-implemented and follows the established patterns for mock objects in the codebase. The new mock will enable more comprehensive testing of components that depend on the AccountKeeper interface.
Key points:
- The MockAccountKeeper struct and its initialization function are correctly implemented.
- The mocked methods (NewAccountWithAddress and SetAccount) accurately represent the AccountKeeper interface.
- The implementation is consistent with the existing MockBankKeeper in the same file.
These changes enhance the testing capabilities of the project by providing a mock for account-related operations. This will allow for more isolated and controlled unit tests for components that interact with the AccountKeeper.
To ensure that the MockAccountKeeper is being utilized effectively in tests, you may want to run the following command to check for its usage:
This will help verify that the new mock is being integrated into the existing test suite.
Action Required: Further Verification of MockAccountKeeper Usage
To ensure that MockAccountKeeper is being utilized effectively in tests, please execute the following shell scripts:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of MockAccountKeeper in test files
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'MockAccountKeeper'
Length of output: 47
Script:
# Search for instantiation of MockAccountKeeper using its constructor in test files
rg --type go -g '*_test.go' 'NewMockAccountKeeper'
Length of output: 50
Script:
# Perform a broader search for any usage of MockAccountKeeper across all Go files
rg --type go 'MockAccountKeeper'
Length of output: 2012
| @@ -168,6 +169,8 @@ func New(appdb dbm.DB, chainID string) (*App, error) { | |||
| return runtimeApp.ModuleManager.InitGenesis(ctx, appCodec, genesisState) | |||
| }) | |||
|
|
|||
| runtimeApp.SetTxDecoder(helpers.NewTxDecoder(appCodec).Decode) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The new SetTxDecoder implementation introduces a custom transaction decoder in testapp/testapp.go. However, existing tests in app/peptide/txstore/txstore_test.go do not cover this new decoder.
Action Items:
- Add comprehensive tests for the custom transaction decoder to ensure it handles various transaction types correctly.
- Verify that the new decoder does not interfere with existing transaction processing logic.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Custom transaction decoder set.
The addition of a custom transaction decoder using the helpers package is consistent with the PR objective and likely enhances the application's transaction handling capabilities.
However, given the significance of this change to transaction processing:
- Please ensure comprehensive testing of this new decoder with various transaction types to verify it doesn't break existing functionality.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this custom decoder for future maintainers.
To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any existing transaction decoding logic that might be affected by this change and locate relevant test files for ensuring proper coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any existing transaction decoding logic that might be affected
# Test: Search for existing transaction decoding logic
rg --type go 'SetTxDecoder|DecodeTransaction|UnmarshalTransaction' --glob '!testapp/testapp.go'
# Test: Look for test files related to transaction processing
fd -e go | rg '(tx|transaction).*_test\.go$'
Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the transaction store test file for tests related to the new decoder
# Check for usage of SetTxDecoder or helpers.NewTxDecoder in tests
grep -E 'SetTxDecoder|helpers\.NewTxDecoder' app/peptide/txstore/txstore_test.go
# If needed, display the entire test file for manual review
cat app/peptide/txstore/txstore_test.go
Length of output: 2204
| // TODO we should check for withdrawal messages on all transaction types. | ||
| // Unfortunately, we can't get the app's TxDecoder inside the builder. | ||
| // We may want to explore using a PostHandler to manage withdrawals instead. | ||
| return execTxResult, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the implications of ignoring unmarshalling errors
The changes to error handling in parseWithdrawalMessages raise some concerns:
- Ignoring unmarshalling errors could lead to missed withdrawal messages, potentially affecting the system's integrity.
- The TODO comments suggest that the current implementation is not ideal and needs improvement.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Instead of silently returning on unmarshalling errors, log these errors for debugging purposes.
- Implement a more robust solution for checking withdrawal messages across all transaction types.
- Explore the suggested PostHandler approach for managing withdrawals, as it might provide a more comprehensive solution.
To address these concerns, consider implementing a logging mechanism for unmarshalling errors:
if err := cosmosTx.Unmarshal(tx); err != nil {
+ // Log the error for debugging purposes
+ b.logger.Error("Failed to unmarshal transaction", "error", err)
// TODO we should check for withdrawal messages on all transaction types.
// Unfortunately, we can't get the app's TxDecoder inside the builder.
// We may want to explore using a PostHandler to manage withdrawals instead.
return execTxResult, nil
}Additionally, create a task to explore the PostHandler approach for managing withdrawals. This could potentially resolve the issues with checking withdrawal messages across all transaction types.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| if tx, err := decoder(txBytes); err == nil { | ||
| return tx, nil | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return nil, errors.New("failed to decode tx") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Include decoder error details in the final error message
Currently, when all decoders fail, the returned error message "failed to decode tx" lacks specific information about the cause of the failure. Including the last encountered error can aid in debugging and provide more context.
Apply this diff to include the last error in the returned error message:
func (d *TxDecoder) Decode(txBytes []byte) (sdktypes.Tx, error) {
+ var lastErr error
for _, decoder := range []sdktypes.TxDecoder{
d.authTxDecoder,
rolluptx.DepositDecoder,
} {
if tx, err := decoder(txBytes); err == nil {
return tx, nil
+ } else {
+ lastErr = err
}
}
- return nil, errors.New("failed to decode tx")
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to decode tx: %w", lastErr)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if tx, err := decoder(txBytes); err == nil { | |
| return tx, nil | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil, errors.New("failed to decode tx") | |
| var lastErr error | |
| for _, decoder := range []sdktypes.TxDecoder{ | |
| d.authTxDecoder, | |
| rolluptx.DepositDecoder, | |
| } { | |
| if tx, err := decoder(txBytes); err == nil { | |
| return tx, nil | |
| } else { | |
| lastErr = err | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to decode tx: %w", lastErr) |
| func (m *MnemonicConfig) Secrets() (*Secrets, error) { | ||
| wallet, err := hdwallet.NewFromMnemonic(m.Mnemonic) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create wallet: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| account := func(path string) accounts.Account { | ||
| return accounts.Account{URL: accounts.URL{Path: path}} | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| deployer, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Deployer)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| cliqueSigner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.CliqueSigner)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| sysCfgOwner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.SysCfgOwner)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| proposer, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Proposer)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| batcher, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Batcher)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| sequencerP2P, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.SequencerP2P)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| alice, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Alice)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| bob, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Bob)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| mallory, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Mallory)) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Suggestion: Reduce code duplication when retrieving private keys
The process of retrieving private keys for each account repeats the same pattern multiple times. Consider refactoring this code to eliminate duplication, which will improve maintainability and readability.
Apply this diff to refactor the private key retrieval:
func (m *MnemonicConfig) Secrets() (*Secrets, error) {
wallet, err := hdwallet.NewFromMnemonic(m.Mnemonic)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create wallet: %w", err)
}
account := func(path string) accounts.Account {
return accounts.Account{URL: accounts.URL{Path: path}}
}
+ type keyInfo struct {
+ name string
+ path string
+ }
+
+ keys := []keyInfo{
+ {name: "Deployer", path: m.Deployer},
+ {name: "CliqueSigner", path: m.CliqueSigner},
+ {name: "SysCfgOwner", path: m.SysCfgOwner},
+ {name: "Proposer", path: m.Proposer},
+ {name: "Batcher", path: m.Batcher},
+ {name: "SequencerP2P", path: m.SequencerP2P},
+ {name: "Alice", path: m.Alice},
+ {name: "Bob", path: m.Bob},
+ {name: "Mallory", path: m.Mallory},
+ }
+
+ privKeys := make(map[string]*ecdsa.PrivateKey)
+ for _, k := range keys {
+ privKey, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(k.path))
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get private key for %s: %w", k.name, err)
+ }
+ privKeys[k.name] = privKey
+ }
- deployer, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Deployer))
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- cliqueSigner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.CliqueSigner))
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- sysCfgOwner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.SysCfgOwner))
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- // ... (repeated for other accounts)
return &Secrets{
- Deployer: deployer,
- CliqueSigner: cliqueSigner,
- SysCfgOwner: sysCfgOwner,
- // ... (other accounts)
+ Deployer: privKeys["Deployer"],
+ CliqueSigner: privKeys["CliqueSigner"],
+ SysCfgOwner: privKeys["SysCfgOwner"],
+ Proposer: privKeys["Proposer"],
+ Batcher: privKeys["Batcher"],
+ SequencerP2P: privKeys["SequencerP2P"],
+ Alice: privKeys["Alice"],
+ Bob: privKeys["Bob"],
+ Mallory: privKeys["Mallory"],
Wallet: wallet,
}, nil
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func (m *MnemonicConfig) Secrets() (*Secrets, error) { | |
| wallet, err := hdwallet.NewFromMnemonic(m.Mnemonic) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create wallet: %w", err) | |
| } | |
| account := func(path string) accounts.Account { | |
| return accounts.Account{URL: accounts.URL{Path: path}} | |
| } | |
| deployer, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Deployer)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| cliqueSigner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.CliqueSigner)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| sysCfgOwner, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.SysCfgOwner)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| proposer, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Proposer)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| batcher, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Batcher)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| sequencerP2P, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.SequencerP2P)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| alice, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Alice)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| bob, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Bob)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| mallory, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(m.Mallory)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| func (m *MnemonicConfig) Secrets() (*Secrets, error) { | |
| wallet, err := hdwallet.NewFromMnemonic(m.Mnemonic) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create wallet: %w", err) | |
| } | |
| account := func(path string) accounts.Account { | |
| return accounts.Account{URL: accounts.URL{Path: path}} | |
| } | |
| type keyInfo struct { | |
| name string | |
| path string | |
| } | |
| keys := []keyInfo{ | |
| {name: "Deployer", path: m.Deployer}, | |
| {name: "CliqueSigner", path: m.CliqueSigner}, | |
| {name: "SysCfgOwner", path: m.SysCfgOwner}, | |
| {name: "Proposer", path: m.Proposer}, | |
| {name: "Batcher", path: m.Batcher}, | |
| {name: "SequencerP2P", path: m.SequencerP2P}, | |
| {name: "Alice", path: m.Alice}, | |
| {name: "Bob", path: m.Bob}, | |
| {name: "Mallory", path: m.Mallory}, | |
| } | |
| privKeys := make(map[string]*ecdsa.PrivateKey) | |
| for _, k := range keys { | |
| privKey, err := wallet.PrivateKey(account(k.path)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get private key for %s: %w", k.name, err) | |
| } | |
| privKeys[k.name] = privKey | |
| } | |
| return &Secrets{ | |
| Deployer: privKeys["Deployer"], | |
| CliqueSigner: privKeys["CliqueSigner"], | |
| SysCfgOwner: privKeys["SysCfgOwner"], | |
| Proposer: privKeys["Proposer"], | |
| Batcher: privKeys["Batcher"], | |
| SequencerP2P: privKeys["SequencerP2P"], | |
| Alice: privKeys["Alice"], | |
| Bob: privKeys["Bob"], | |
| Mallory: privKeys["Mallory"], | |
| Wallet: wallet, | |
| }, nil | |
| } |
| var monomerReplace string | ||
| if isTest { | ||
| currentDir, err := os.Getwd() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("get current working directory: %v", err) | ||
| } | ||
| currentDirAbs, err := filepath.Abs(currentDir) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("get absolute path: %v", err) | ||
| } | ||
| monomerReplace = fmt.Sprintf("github.com/polymerdao/monomer => %s", filepath.Dir(currentDirAbs)) | ||
| } | ||
| content := replacer.Replace(goMod.String(), "replace (", fmt.Sprintf(`replace ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle 'monomerReplace' initialization when 'isTest' is false
When isTest is false, monomerReplace is not assigned a value but is still used in the fmt.Sprintf call at line 264. This could lead to an empty %s placeholder in the generated string, potentially causing an invalid go.mod file.
Apply this diff to ensure monomerReplace is always initialized:
var monomerReplace string
if isTest {
// Existing code to set monomerReplace
} else {
+ monomerReplace = ""
}
content := replacer.Replace(goMod.String(), "replace (", fmt.Sprintf(`replace (
cosmossdk.io/core => cosmossdk.io/core v0.11.1
github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2 v2.3.4 => github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2 v2.3.2
github.com/crate-crypto/go-ipa => github.com/crate-crypto/go-ipa v0.0.0-20231205143816-408dbffb2041
github.com/crate-crypto/go-kzg-4844 v1.0.0 => github.com/crate-crypto/go-kzg-4844 v0.7.0
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum => github.com/joshklop/op-geth v0.0.0-20240515205036-e3b990384a74
github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p => github.com/joshklop/go-libp2p v0.0.0-20241004015633-cfc9936c6811
github.com/quic-go/quic-go => github.com/quic-go/quic-go v0.39.3
github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go => github.com/quic-go/webtransport-go v0.6.0
-%s
+%s
`, monomerReplace))Alternatively, modify the code to include monomerReplace in the formatted string only when isTest is true.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| return &EngineAPI{ | ||
| txValidator: txValidator, | ||
| signer: signer.New(appchainCtx, privKey), | ||
| signer: signer.New(appchainCtx, monomer.PrivKey), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential security issue: Usage of global monomer.PrivKey
Using monomer.PrivKey directly when initializing the signer may pose security risks, as global variables can be accessed or modified unintentionally from other parts of the codebase. It's advisable to securely pass the private key as a parameter or retrieve it from a secure source to ensure proper key management.
Consider updating the code to pass the private key explicitly:
func NewEngineAPI(
b *builder.Builder,
txValidator TxValidator,
blockStore DB,
appchainCtx *appchainClient.Context,
metrics Metrics,
+ privKey someKeyType,
) *EngineAPI {
return &EngineAPI{
txValidator: txValidator,
- signer: signer.New(appchainCtx, monomer.PrivKey),
+ signer: signer.New(appchainCtx, privKey),
blockStore: blockStore,
builder: b,
metrics: metrics,
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| flagL1AllocsPath = "monomer.dev.l1-allocs" | ||
| flagL1DeploymentsPath = "monomer.dev.l1-deployments" | ||
| flagDeployConfigPath = "monomer.dev.deploy-config" | ||
| flagMneumonicsPath = "monomer.dev.mneumonics" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the typo: 'mneumonics' should be 'mnemonics'
There's a typographical error in the variable and constant names. The correct spelling is 'mnemonics'. Updating this will improve code readability and prevent confusion.
[typographical & grammatical issues]
Apply this diff to fix the spelling:
-const flagMneumonicsPath = "monomer.dev.mneumonics"
+const flagMnemonicsPath = "monomer.dev.mnemonics"
...
-cmd.Flags().String(flagMneumonicsPath, "", "")
+cmd.Flags().String(flagMnemonicsPath, "", "")
...
-mneumonics, err := readFromFileOrGetDefault(v.GetString(flagMneumonicsPath), func() (*opdevnet.MnemonicConfig, error) {
+mnemonics, err := readFromFileOrGetDefault(v.GetString(flagMnemonicsPath), func() (*opdevnet.MnemonicConfig, error) {
...
-secrets, err := mneumonics.Secrets()
+secrets, err := mnemonics.Secrets()
...
-return fmt.Errorf("get mneumonic config: %v", err)
+return fmt.Errorf("get mnemonic config: %v", err)Also applies to: 85-85, 239-243
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1URL, "ws://127.0.0.1:9001", "") | ||
| cmd.Flags().String(flagOPNodeURL, "http://127.0.0.1:9002", "") | ||
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1DeploymentsPath, "", "") | ||
| cmd.Flags().String(flagDeployConfigPath, "", "") | ||
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1AllocsPath, "", "") | ||
| cmd.Flags().String(flagMneumonicsPath, "", "") | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add descriptions to command-line flags for better usability
Several command-line flags have empty descriptions, which may lead to confusion for users. Providing meaningful descriptions enhances the clarity and usability of the CLI.
Apply this diff to add descriptions:
cmd.Flags().Bool(flagDev, false, "Run the OP Stack devnet in-process for testing")
cmd.Flags().String(flagL1URL, "ws://127.0.0.1:9001", "URL of the L1 node")
cmd.Flags().String(flagOPNodeURL, "http://127.0.0.1:9002", "URL of the OP node")
cmd.Flags().String(flagL1DeploymentsPath, "", "Path to the L1 deployments JSON file")
cmd.Flags().String(flagDeployConfigPath, "", "Path to the deploy configuration JSON file")
cmd.Flags().String(flagL1AllocsPath, "", "Path to the L1 allocations JSON file")
cmd.Flags().String(flagMnemonicsPath, "", "Path to the mnemonics configuration file")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1URL, "ws://127.0.0.1:9001", "") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagOPNodeURL, "http://127.0.0.1:9002", "") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1DeploymentsPath, "", "") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagDeployConfigPath, "", "") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1AllocsPath, "", "") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagMneumonicsPath, "", "") | |
| }, | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1URL, "ws://127.0.0.1:9001", "URL of the L1 node") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagOPNodeURL, "http://127.0.0.1:9002", "URL of the OP node") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1DeploymentsPath, "", "Path to the L1 deployments JSON file") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagDeployConfigPath, "", "Path to the deploy configuration JSON file") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagL1AllocsPath, "", "Path to the L1 allocations JSON file") | |
| cmd.Flags().String(flagMnemonicsPath, "", "Path to the mnemonics configuration file") | |
| }, |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Depositstruct for handling L1 transaction applications.Bug Fixes
parseWithdrawalMessagesmethod.Documentation
Chores
go.modfile.