Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move NAD nodes with a public function #101

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

EstherDarkish
Copy link
Contributor

@EstherDarkish EstherDarkish commented Sep 25, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Possibility to move a network area diagram's node using a public function.

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Allow to programatically move a node.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

BOUTIER Charly added 3 commits September 25, 2024 00:21
…nction in network-area-diagram-viewer.ts

Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
@EstherDarkish EstherDarkish changed the title Poc nad move node from gridstudy Move NAD nodes with a public function Sep 26, 2024
BOUTIER Charly added 2 commits September 26, 2024 23:26
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
@jamal-khey jamal-khey self-requested a review September 27, 2024 07:50
Copy link
Contributor

@jamal-khey jamal-khey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code OK, improuvement can be made on types

Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
jamal-khey
jamal-khey previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jamal-khey jamal-khey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me.
Code Ok
Test Ok

@souissimai souissimai self-requested a review September 27, 2024 12:09
souissimai
souissimai previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: BOUTIER Charly <charly.boutier@rte-france.com>
@EstherDarkish EstherDarkish dismissed stale reviews from souissimai and jamal-khey via 42278cc September 27, 2024 12:11
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
17.4% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@jonenst jonenst merged commit b51daf9 into main Sep 27, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@jonenst jonenst deleted the POC_NAD_move_node_from_gridstudy branch September 27, 2024 12:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants