Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIM CRAC permissive imports #784

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

CIM CRAC permissive imports #784

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

pet-mit
Copy link
Collaborator

@pet-mit pet-mit commented Aug 17, 2023

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
CIM CRAC creator reads contingencies in B55 series only, and CNECs in B57 series only.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Import is no more permissive: contingencies can now be read in B56 and B57, and CNECs in B56

} else {
throw new FaraoException(String.format("Unrecognized optimization_MarketObjectStatus.status: %s", optimizationStatus));
}
return Objects.nonNull(optimizationStatus) && optimizationStatus.equals(CNECS_MNEC_MARKET_OBJECT_STATUS);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on ne veut plus lever une exception ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

non parce que les B56 ne contiennent pas cette info

@Godelaine Godelaine removed the PR: WIP label Aug 30, 2023
@Godelaine Godelaine merged commit 26a8f54 into master Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants