Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor output classes #54

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Refactor output classes #54

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

p-arvy
Copy link
Member

@p-arvy p-arvy commented Jan 12, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

The classes for OR output are refactored.

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

Signed-off-by: parvy <pierre.arvy@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: parvy <pierre.arvy@artelys.com>
Signed-off-by: parvy <pierre.arvy@artelys.com>
@p-arvy p-arvy requested a review from annetill January 12, 2024 17:01
@p-arvy p-arvy self-assigned this Jan 12, 2024
@p-arvy p-arvy added the Java label Jan 12, 2024
p-arvy and others added 2 commits January 12, 2024 18:21
private static final int ID_COLUMN_INDEX = 1;

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You have removed this FIXME? So no issue or you have the answer?

Copy link
Member Author

@p-arvy p-arvy Jan 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me no issue. In the export of AMPL code, there is no column V. Only target V. And the values used for export are V[n] for bus n (the only values available).

Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@olperr1 olperr1 merged commit 63dd464 into main Jan 18, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants