Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2 from 2.18.0 to 2.19.0 #137

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 17, 2023

Bumps github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2 from 2.18.0 to 2.19.0.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2's releases.

v2.18.1

Bugs Fixed

  • hclsyntax: Conditional expressions will no longer panic when one or both of their results are "marked", as is the case for situations like how HashiCorp Terraform tracks its concept of "sensitive values". (#630)
Changelog

Sourced from github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2's changelog.

v2.19.0 (October 16, 2023)

Enhancements

  • ext/dynblock: dynblock.Expand now supports an optional hook for calling applications to check and potentially veto (by returning error diagnostics) particular for_each values. The behavior is unchanged for callers that don't set the new option. (#634)

Bugs Fixed

  • hclsyntax: Further fixes for treatment of "marked" values in the conditional expression, and better tracking of refined values into the conditional expression results, building on the fixes from v2.18.1. (#633)

v2.18.1 (October 5, 2023)

Bugs Fixed

  • hclsyntax: Conditional expressions will no longer panic when one or both of their results are "marked", as is the case for situations like how HashiCorp Terraform tracks its concept of "sensitive values". (#630)
Commits
  • 925bfe8 CHANGELOG: prepare for v2.19.0 release
  • 0af4fe2 ext/dynblock: Allow callers to veto for_each values
  • 4945193 Merge pull request #633 from hashicorp/jbardin/conditional-length-refinements
  • bad33d5 further refine refinement handling
  • e4589e3 Range() calls must always be unmarked
  • 3a30333 refinements of collections must use Range()
  • 63067e8 hcldec: New test for marks+refinements together
  • 6ec7124 hclsyntax: New tests for marks+refinments together
  • cc6d1d0 Merge pull request #554 from hashicorp/kmoe/oss-fuzz
  • a1178d2 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 17, 2023
@ppc64le-cloud-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dependabot[bot]
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mkumatag for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ppc64le-cloud-bot ppc64le-cloud-bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 17, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2-2.19.0 branch 3 times, most recently from edf8113 to ce6a7b0 Compare October 17, 2023 15:01
Bumps [github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2](https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl) from 2.18.0 to 2.19.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](hashicorp/hcl@v2.18.0...v2.19.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2-2.19.0 branch from ce6a7b0 to 29ec98c Compare October 17, 2023 15:03
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 18, 2023

Superseded by #139.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Oct 18, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/go_modules/github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2-2.19.0 branch October 18, 2023 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant