-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prebid core: cached bids should contain the ID of the auction they actually won #10541
Merged
+39
−5
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -464,6 +464,14 @@ export function newTargeting(auctionManager) { | |
if (typeof filterFunction === 'function') { | ||
bidsReceived = bidsReceived.filter(bid => latestAuctionForAdUnit[bid.adUnitCode] === bid.auctionId || !!filterFunction(bid)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
bidsReceived = bidsReceived | ||
.map(bid => { | ||
if (latestAuctionForAdUnit[bid.adUnitCode] !== bid.auctionId) { | ||
bid.latestAuctionForAdUnit = latestAuctionForAdUnit[bid.adUnitCode]; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. On naming , I agree with a shorter name yes |
||
} | ||
return bid; | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
bidsReceived = bidsReceived | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks more suited to
forEach
. Also I think it should be done after all filtering is done, around line 480, or do you see a reason why it's better to tag them here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right,
forEach
is mor suited for this.Yes, I agree that the property should be set after all filtering is done, provided it should be set on all the bids in the pool (as you mentioned in your comment below). The reason I added my change where I did was to avoid increasing the size of bid objects in the cases where
auctionId
would have the same value as the new property. But I think it's a good idea to set the property on all bids in the pool.