Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Caroda Bid Adapter: initial adapter release #8845

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

carodaio
Copy link
Contributor

@carodaio carodaio commented Aug 16, 2022

Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • New bidder adapter
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Does this change affect user-facing APIs or examples documented on http://prebid.org?
  • Other

Description of change

Initial implementation of the caroda prebid adapter

  • test parameters for validating bids
{
  bidder: 'caroda',
  params: {
    ctok: '240ce9490c5434354',
    placementId: 'test'
  }
}

[X] Be sure to test the integration with your adserver using the Hello World sample page.

For any changes that affect user-facing APIs or example code documented on http://prebid.org, please provide:

@ChrisHuie
Copy link
Collaborator

@carodaio looks like you have a few linting errors. If you could please fix 🙏

@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie requested a review from lksharma August 16, 2022 18:12
@ChrisHuie ChrisHuie changed the title Prebid adapter initial implementation Caroda Bid Adapter: initial adapter release Aug 16, 2022
@carodaio carodaio force-pushed the prebid-adapter-initial-implementation branch from 0b519ab to e849d66 Compare September 9, 2022 09:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@lksharma lksharma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carodaio, I left some minor comments. Let me know if you have any questions.

modules/carodaBidAdapter.js Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/carodaBidAdapter.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@lksharma lksharma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lksharma lksharma merged commit 3265b05 into prebid:master Sep 15, 2022
JacobKlein26 pushed a commit to nextmillenniummedia/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2023
* WIP|

* work on the response format

* added md file

* some fixes and simplications

* made schain optional

* tests WIP

* fixed bid validation

* request common structure tests

* added privacy tests

* added bid specific logic tests

* final unit tests

* renamed setOnAny to getFirstWithKey

* changed interpretResponse to arrow function

* removed extra newline

* slight adjustment of request/response format

* added ad targeting and ad id to bid response

* fixed undefined ad id error

* fixed linting

* fix: removed setting ad id in interpret response

* fix: impoved pageview id handling when caroda is loaded later than prebid

* style: added semicolumns

* added price type bid validation

Co-authored-by: Ioan-Carol Plangu <info@plangu.com>
jorgeluisrocha pushed a commit to jwplayer/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
* WIP|

* work on the response format

* added md file

* some fixes and simplications

* made schain optional

* tests WIP

* fixed bid validation

* request common structure tests

* added privacy tests

* added bid specific logic tests

* final unit tests

* renamed setOnAny to getFirstWithKey

* changed interpretResponse to arrow function

* removed extra newline

* slight adjustment of request/response format

* added ad targeting and ad id to bid response

* fixed undefined ad id error

* fixed linting

* fix: removed setting ad id in interpret response

* fix: impoved pageview id handling when caroda is loaded later than prebid

* style: added semicolumns

* added price type bid validation

Co-authored-by: Ioan-Carol Plangu <info@plangu.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants