-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assure a default toolset is always set. #774
Conversation
src/base/tools.lua
Outdated
parts[2] = "LLVM-" .. parts[2]:sub(6) | ||
end | ||
end | ||
p.warnOnce(identifier, "toolset '%s' is deprecated, toolset 'msc-%s' instead.", identifier, identifier) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"toolset '%s' is deprecated, toolset 'msc-%s' instead."
should be "toolset '%s' is deprecated, use toolset 'msc-%s' instead."
instead. (Added use after the comma) The line above shouldn't have the TODO anymore.
Also, I'm not sure this should be deprecated? It seems a bit arbitrary to require "msc-" to be prefixed to the value that VS will use and display. I'm happy for this to be merged in, but I'm concerned that new users will find this to be completely arbitrary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was the original intention behind leaving the "v140" form in place: that matches what VS uses, and what you see in the IDE, so it is a more "expected" format if you're familiar with the VS projects. We did go back and forth on it though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just put the deprecation message in there, because there is a comment that says "we should deprecate this"...
https://github.com/premake/premake-core/blob/master/src/base/tools.lua#L34
9654055
to
89b75cf
Compare
Removed the deprecation warning, but it still normalizes to "msc-v140", we could potentially remove that...
since both are the same. |
89b75cf
to
e824a34
Compare
Removed the deprecation warning a while ago... need more feedback however on what direction we want to go for the normalization? |
e824a34
to
a2c02ef
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I vote for the "msc-v140" approach.
a2c02ef
to
fd41938
Compare
We're running into the issue where:
doesn't work, because the majority of time, the toolset is not actually set. This change assures the filter always has a valid value in it, and not just 'nil' in the majority of cases.
We also normalize the toolset, so when you do
it normalizes to
msc-v140
, as well as the other rules implemented in thep.tool.canonical
function.We should realy deprecate the v140 naming however, and require explicit msc-v140 usage, so I added a p.warnOnce in there too.