You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The problem in issue #880 was caused by the sort using the old sortKey.
For example, given nodes A, B, and C, if B were renamed to D, the sort
was still using B as its sortKey, thus not moving it.
It's a bit of a hack, but if we set g:NERDTreeOldSortOrder to an empty
list, the cached sortKey will be recalculated. I did the same thing for
both the Copy and Add functions as well.
* Force sort to recalculate the cached sortKey.
The problem in issue #880 was caused by the sort using the old sortKey.
For example, given nodes A, B, and C, if B were renamed to D, the sort
was still using B as its sortKey, thus not moving it.
It's a bit of a hack, but if we set g:NERDTreeOldSortOrder to an empty
list, the cached sortKey will be recalculated. I did the same thing for
both the Copy and Add functions as well.
* Add a comment to explain the let ... = [] statement.
Environment
:version
: Vim 8.1git rev-parse --short HEAD
: 808f5b2Process
01
to03
, you will get:Current Result
Expected Result
Sorting need be refreshed after the directory is renamed.
Screenshot(s)
Possible Fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: