Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restyle Fix YAML tests handling of lists of structs that contain lists. #13143

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

restyled-io[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Dec 18, 2021

A duplicate of #13142 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.

⚠️ Even though this PR is not a Fork, it contains outside contributions.
Please review accordingly.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

The following Restylers made fixes:

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
    the original Pull Request

    Expand for example instructions
    ```console
    git remote add upstream https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip.git
    git fetch upstream pull/<this PR number>/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push
    ```
    

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

bzbarsky-apple and others added 3 commits December 18, 2021 02:31
The main issue was that comparing to such a value failed because we
ended up with "iter" variables for both levels of list nesting that
name-collided.

The fix for that was to add "depth" disabmbiguation like we have in
the Darwin codegen already.

While adding a test for this, a few other issues were encountered:

1) The "commandValue" partial, when dealing with an optional or
nullable struct, would do an Emplace() or SetNonNull() for every
single member, which would wipe out earlier members.  The fix for that
is to do them once, and then use .Value() for the recursive partial
invocation.

2) When sending a struct with optional fields, we were requiring the
YAML to specify values for all the fields.  Added
if_include_struct_item_value to allow the YAML to not include values
for such fields.

3) The YAML for checking struct values expected struct field names in
the YAML to be lowerCamelCase instead of matching the XML case.  The
code for sending struct values expected struct field names to match
the XML case.  This inconsistency was very confusing, and this PR
makes both expect the XML case.  I verified that the only codegen
changes due to this were in the TestModeSelectCluster and
Test_TC_DM_2_2 tests.  The latter had actually had its struct fields
ignored because they were the "wrong" case....  Both tests fixed.
@restyled-io restyled-io bot added the restyled label Dec 18, 2021
@restyled-io restyled-io bot closed this Dec 18, 2021
@restyled-io restyled-io bot deleted the restyled/lists-inside-lists branch December 18, 2021 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants