You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the possibility of requesting PMLC documents with non-active treatments, the generator might receive a list of medication statements for active and non-active treatments. The generator should ignore non-active medication statements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Wouldn't it be weird to allow requesting non-active treatments for a PDF, but omit them in the actual document? I would either refuse that particular request in the PMP, or include them in the PDF.
It is indeed an open question. The only use case we have at the moment is the need to retrieve a structured consolidated view of all the treatments to fulfill the functional requirements of the Portail Patient and this use case does not rely on the PDF. For this reason we thought it would be enough (at least for now) to keep the PDF as what it is, the card of active treatments, whether the bundle includes entries for non active treatments or not.
Since indeed the PDF is sent as the original representation of the document, one could argue that it should include all the treatments in the bundle. In this case, the alternative would be to add another table to the PDF for non-active treatments.
With the possibility of requesting PMLC documents with non-active treatments, the generator might receive a list of medication statements for active and non-active treatments. The generator should ignore non-active medication statements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: