-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Conversation
@mariaschett Can you have a quick look at this? This is mostly formatting, but I've added a new subsection in the README for Related work and standards. It is not complete, but I thought it could be a good start. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
ones in our design, but seems to be focused on claims and evidence that are generated and consumed | ||
automatically. Claims and evidence in RATS are designed to be used for remote attestation. The | ||
claims in our binary transparency ecosystem, however, are not limited to the ones used for remote | ||
attestation. We target a wider range of use cases. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be nice to give an example of a use case we target which RATS does not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Done.
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
[Concise Reference Integrity Manifest (CoRIM)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-corim/) | ||
provided by the RATS working group is very similar to a `Claim` as described in this document. | ||
|
||
TODO: Summarize the comparison. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we add a TODO(#?)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
|
||
### Comparison to SCITT | ||
|
||
TBA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we add a TODO(#?)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review :)
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
ones in our design, but seems to be focused on claims and evidence that are generated and consumed | ||
automatically. Claims and evidence in RATS are designed to be used for remote attestation. The | ||
claims in our binary transparency ecosystem, however, are not limited to the ones used for remote | ||
attestation. We target a wider range of use cases. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Done.
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
[Concise Reference Integrity Manifest (CoRIM)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-corim/) | ||
provided by the RATS working group is very similar to a `Claim` as described in this document. | ||
|
||
TODO: Summarize the comparison. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
docs/claim-transparency.md
Outdated
|
||
### Comparison to SCITT | ||
|
||
TBA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here>