Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding multi-stage activation. #170

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 17, 2016
Merged

Adding multi-stage activation. #170

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 17, 2016

Conversation

dmasad
Copy link
Member

@dmasad dmasad commented Sep 12, 2015

Adds a multi-stage activation scheduler, closing #166.

@jackiekazil
Copy link
Member

I'm going to try to look at this, this week.

Flake-8 fixing

Adding minimalistic staged schedule test

Style correction

Additional tests
@jackiekazil jackiekazil force-pushed the staged_activation.166 branch from adcfe8b to 99e7ca3 Compare February 11, 2016 03:57
@jackiekazil
Copy link
Member

Update: this branch has been rebased w/ #169 and minor flake8 issue cleared.

@jackiekazil
Copy link
Member

After a review -- this all looks good to me!! Merging!!

jackiekazil added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2016
@jackiekazil jackiekazil merged commit 6ea0077 into master Feb 17, 2016
@jackiekazil jackiekazil deleted the staged_activation.166 branch February 17, 2016 00:28
EwoutH added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This commit reverts PR #161 projectmesa/mesa-examples#161

That PR assumed that time advancement would be done automatically, like proposed in #2223

We encountered some underlying issues with time, which we couldn't resolve in time.
EwoutH added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
This commit reverts PR #161 projectmesa/mesa-examples#161

That PR assumed that time advancement would be done automatically, like proposed in #2223

We encountered some underlying issues with time, which we couldn't resolve in time.
EwoutH added a commit to EwoutH/mesa that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
…lity (projectmesa#170)

This commit reverts PR projectmesa#161 projectmesa/mesa-examples#161

That PR assumed that time advancement would be done automatically, like proposed in projectmesa#2223

We encountered some underlying issues with time, which we couldn't resolve in time.
EwoutH added a commit to EwoutH/mesa that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
…lity (projectmesa#170)

This commit reverts PR projectmesa#161 projectmesa/mesa-examples#161

That PR assumed that time advancement would be done automatically, like proposed in projectmesa#2223

We encountered some underlying issues with time, which we couldn't resolve in time.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants