Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for scraping multiple mysqld hosts #651
Support for scraping multiple mysqld hosts #651
Changes from all commits
05c029d
91e12f9
bd55a1d
dd20753
2ffb4b6
cc5798e
7fa4ee1
ee2329a
6600e4d
9a06adc
7bee6e2
981684e
4c82b97
553dfc4
841a34e
b853459
520d515
ba5d06b
956ca4c
2d09c17
2e083ba
29b3c53
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should skip client section as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would break configuration for those that are currently using it with a config file rather than
DATA_SOURCE_NAME
, are we OK with that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I think we need to keep this so it continues to work as-is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if a password contains : ? shouldn't we build this more carefully?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has been a long-standing issue with various Go SQL drivers. They all seem to suffer from this parsing problem.
There's https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql?utm_source=godoc#Config which should probably be used here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am wondering if we couldn't leave this for another issue to rework? This PR is already adding quite a lot.
It will require quite a fair amount of work to pass that along to the Exporter and parse parameters if we move to using
Config
struct, and my time is quite limited right now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's fine. Let's work on it next.