Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(migrations): fix django migration order dependency #6303

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

prowler-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport

This will backport the following commits from master to v5.0:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@vicferpoy vicferpoy force-pushed the backport/v5.0/pr-6302 branch from 3681659 to fa5155a Compare December 23, 2024 11:28
AdriiiPRodri
AdriiiPRodri previously approved these changes Dec 23, 2024
@vicferpoy vicferpoy force-pushed the backport/v5.0/pr-6302 branch from 653dad5 to e51e40b Compare December 23, 2024 12:07
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.07%. Comparing base (9afea57) to head (49593c1).
Report is 7 commits behind head on v5.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             v5.0    #6303      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.95%   93.07%   +3.11%     
==========================================
  Files        1147       61    -1086     
  Lines       35624     5182   -30442     
==========================================
- Hits        32047     4823   -27224     
+ Misses       3577      359    -3218     
Components Coverage Δ
prowler ∅ <ø> (∅)
api 93.07% <98.82%> (∅)

@vicferpoy vicferpoy merged commit bea13ff into v5.0 Dec 23, 2024
11 checks passed
@vicferpoy vicferpoy deleted the backport/v5.0/pr-6302 branch December 23, 2024 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport This PR contains a backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants