-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bridge does not attach to perimeter, end just drops #10231
Comments
Looks similar to this issue I reported on aplha5: #9988 |
Hi, there is .3mf with your issue for testing and investigation. |
Not sure what you mean, this is the STL i designed, which seems to work fine. |
|
I removed the stl file i created, as it seems to bring confusion. |
Yes, everything is ok. It is for our purpose... 3mf with exact settings is for us much beneficial, so I attached it directly. |
Ah, makes sense. But you have to realize that that one is working somehow. The other STL is failing. |
I have similar issue #10313 , in my case trigger was extrusion width. |
I tried it with the default settings, still have this issue. |
Just tried 2.6.0 beta 1. Have tried setting extrusion-width to default and played with other settings to no avail. Project File: |
@crx-cooper @gojux we are looking into it SPE-1726 |
We have improved region detection in task SPE-1726. This should eliminate some situations where thin regions separate bridges. However, there may still be models with slicing parameters where the issue could appear. Please keep this in mind. I am closing this issue for now. |
I'm still getting this issue in 2.6.1 Release. I have to turn Infill Overlap to over 100% to get bridging to just barely connect to the perimeters, but of course then regular infil overlaps way too much. Anything less than 100% overlap and my bridges do not connect. Can bridge anchor length have its own setting and not be tied directly to regular infill settings? |
Please reopen this issue! |
Yes, I agree! Please reopen this, or handle it in #11500, which has now also been closed. In that issue, it seems version 2.7a has also been tested, with the same result. To see the problem, just open a bridging test model and compare the slicing output from 2.5.2 with any version from 2.6.0 up. It is not printable and the bridge will drop in one or both ends. Whenever I have a model containing any bridge, I must now go back and slice that in 2.5.2 instead of the latest version, for the bridges not to fail. |
Any word on this? Bridges still appear to be broken in 2.7.0-rc1. |
Description of the bug
When printing bridges, the end just drops without attaching to the perimeter. This works fine for the first two passes of the bridge, but not for the infill. It works fine on the starting (right) end, but fails on the end-end (left)
It seems that the parameter "Infill/perimeters overlap" doesn't do anything, i set it to 50% to test, but look:
From another angle, the bridge-end is in the air:
If i use 2.5.0, bridging is totally different, which looks much better:
Project file & How to reproduce
Print the bridge file and see the bridge dropping
Or just upload the file, slice and look at the ends of the bridge.
Failing
Bridge Test.zip
Checklist of files included above
Version of PrusaSlicer
2.6.0 alpha 6
Operating system
Windows 10
Printer model
Mini+ (bear)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: