Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.12.1-alpine to 3.13.0a4-alpine #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2024

Conversation

psadi
Copy link
Owner

@psadi psadi commented Mar 15, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.13.0a4-alpine, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
medium severity 514 Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion')
SNYK-ALPINE319-EXPAT-6241037
No Known Exploit
high severity 614 Resource Exhaustion
SNYK-ALPINE319-EXPAT-6241038
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Resource Exhaustion

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@psadi psadi merged commit a8cfe2c into main Mar 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@psadi psadi deleted the snyk-fix-098cf4735f1c0b630ae16acf44a9aa78 branch April 27, 2024 05:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants