wording changes for branches

[kilyinov]

changed From/To to Source/Target for branches

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new function for analyzing pull requests, providing users with confirmation that the analysis has been completed.
  • Enhanced clarity in branch terminology by renaming parameters from "From Branch" to "Source Branch" and "To Branch" to "Target Branch" in the gathering process.

• Bug Fixes

  • No functional changes; the overall functionality remains unaffected by the renaming.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@kilyinov has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 9 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f55e813 and 57a0d2d.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new function, analyze_pull_request, to the bb/pr/create.py file, which prints a completion message for analysis. Additionally, the parameter names in the existing gather_facts function have been modified for clarity, changing "From Branch" to "Source Branch" and "To Branch" to "Target Branch." These updates maintain the original functionality while enhancing code readability.

Changes

File	Change Summary
bb/pr/create.py	Added analyze_pull_request function; renamed parameters: "From Branch" to "Source Branch" and "To Branch" to "Target Branch" in gather_facts.

Poem

In the code where branches play,
A rabbit hops and finds the way.
"Source" and "Target," clear and bright,
Guiding changes, day and night.
With every hop, we celebrate,
A clearer path to integrate! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac26a68 and f55e813.

Files selected for processing (1)

• bb/pr/create.py (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

bb/pr/create.py (1)

84-85: LGTM!

The parameter name changes from "From Branch" to "Source Branch" and "To Branch" to "Target Branch" are consistent with the PR objective of modifying the terminology used in the context of branches. The changes enhance clarity and consistency in the language used when referring to branches in the codebase.

[coderabbitai]

Remove the unused function or implement the analysis logic.

The analyze_pull_request function is not being used and does not serve any purpose in the current state. The function name is misleading as it does not perform any analysis.

Consider the following suggestions:

• Remove the function if it is not required.
• If the function is required, implement the actual analysis logic as implied by the function name.

[psadi]

@kilyinov please squash multiple commits into a single one. remove the unwanted function call