-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Kubernetes v1.23.0 #1681
Conversation
Does the PR have any schema changes?Looking good! No breaking changes found. |
94a0cc1
to
55a8663
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Looking good! No breaking changes found. New resources:
|
1 similar comment
Does the PR have any schema changes?Looking good! No breaking changes found. New resources:
|
f34665a
to
9df6c29
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Found 2 breaking changes: New resources:
|
3e787f6
to
2a287d4
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Found 2 breaking changes: New resources:
|
2a287d4
to
d1aaeb2
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Found 2 breaking changes: New resources:
|
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { input as inputs, output as outputs, enums } from "../../types"; | |||
import * as utilities from "../../utilities"; | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* ClusterRoleBinding references a ClusterRole, but not contain it. It can reference a ClusterRole in the global namespace, and adds who information via Subject. Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 ClusterRoleBinding, and will no longer be served in v1.22. | |||
* ClusterRoleBinding references a ClusterRole, but not contain it. It can reference a ClusterRole in the global namespace, and adds who information via Subject. Deprecated in v1.17 in favor of rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 ClusterRoleBinding, and will no longer be served in v1.20. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's with these updates to deprecations from the past?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's odd. I'm guessing they actually removed in v1.20 but forgot to update the comment, but I'll have to check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine in general. Just the one question.
d1aaeb2
to
32fb307
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Found 2 breaking changes: New resources:
|
1 similar comment
Does the PR have any schema changes?Found 2 breaking changes: New resources:
|
79a2223
to
9d13e04
Compare
Does the PR have any schema changes?Looking good! No breaking changes found. |
Related issues (optional)
Fix #1680