Add MultiFittingProblem class and example

[NicolaCourtier]

Description

Add a new Problem class that accepts multiple fitting problems and returns one combined problem for passing to a cost function. This PR builds on and should be merged after #359.

Issue reference

Fixes part of #238.

Review

Before you mark your PR as ready for review, please ensure that you've considered the following:

• Updated the CHANGELOG.md in reverse chronological order (newest at the top) with a concise description of the changes, including the PR number.
• Noted any breaking changes, including details on how it might impact existing functionality.

Type of change

• New Feature: A non-breaking change that adds new functionality.
• Optimization: A code change that improves performance.
• Examples: A change to existing or additional examples.
• Bug Fix: A non-breaking change that addresses an issue.
• Documentation: Updates to documentation or new documentation for new features.
• Refactoring: Non-functional changes that improve the codebase.
• Style: Non-functional changes related to code style (formatting, naming, etc).
• Testing: Additional tests to improve coverage or confirm functionality.
• Other: (Insert description of change)

Key checklist:

• No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
• All unit tests pass: $ nox -s tests
• The documentation builds: $ nox -s doctest

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ nox -s quick.

Further checks:

• Code is well-commented, especially in complex or unclear areas.
• Added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• Checked that coverage remains or improves, and added tests if necessary to maintain or increase coverage.

Thank you for contributing to our project! Your efforts help us to deliver great software.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.82353% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.67%. Comparing base (d68a70d) to head (7eeeb00).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pybop/models/base_model.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #364      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    98.51%   98.67%   +0.15%     
===========================================
  Files           46       47       +1     
  Lines         2960     3015      +55     
===========================================
+ Hits          2916     2975      +59     
+ Misses          44       40       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[brosaplanella]

Overall looks good, nice work! See my comment on the parameters.

[BradyPlanden]

Thanks for this @NicolaCourtier. I think it's coming along well, I've made a few comments for you to look at. As a more general thought, do you see any reason this couldn't be a MultiProblem class that composes multiple instances ofFittingProblem or DesignProblem? Perhaps even combined instances of both (with an update to BaseOptimiser for minimising logic. This seems to be the logical next step, but we could do it now instead of refactoring this class later.

[NicolaCourtier]

Merge after #451

[BradyPlanden]

LGTM - thanks for the addition @NicolaCourtier!