pass extra argument in arguments validator

[andresliszt]

This PR tries to solve this pydantic issue. It gets from config the key extra_fields_behavior and performs the validations with respect to the value. For now i applied it only in the kw arguments, if you think this is fine i could add it to the positional arguments as well

• [ x] Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• [ x] Pydantic tests pass with this pydantic-core (except for expected changes)
• [ x] My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1094 (0e1dedd) into main (c7daf16) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1094   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.70%   89.70%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines       16359    16360    +1     
  Branches       35       35           
=======================================
+ Hits        14675    14676    +1     
  Misses       1677     1677           
  Partials        7        7           

Files	Coverage Δ
src/validators/arguments.rs	99.58% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7daf16...0e1dedd. Read the comment docs.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1094 will degrade performances by 18.28%

_{Comparing andresliszt:add/extra-arguments-validator (0e1dedd) with main (c7daf16)}

Summary

❌ 2 regressions
✅ 138 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	andresliszt:add/extra-arguments-validator	Change
❌	test_core_str	31 µs	37.9 µs	-18.25%
❌	test_core_future_str	31.3 µs	38.3 µs	-18.28%

[davidhewitt]

Thanks, this looks good to me 👍