📝 Refactor Documentation for ISBN and MAC address modules

[yezz123]

I try it locally its working fine

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d05c882) 100.00% compared to head (5caa73e) 100.00%.
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 5caa73e differs from pull request most recent head 2838771. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2838771 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #124   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        10           
  Lines          665       665           
  Branches       166       166           
=========================================
  Hits           665       665           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sydney-runkle]

Looks good overall, but could you please add back the more informative docstrings?

[sydney-runkle]

I try it locally its working fine

Does this mean that you've tried serving the pydantic docs locally with these changes, and things run as expected?

[sydney-runkle]

@yezz123,

Any chance you'll be able to incorporate some changes soon? Hoping to release a new version of pydantic and would love to get this new version of pydantic-extra-types in.

[yezz123]

@sydney-runkle we are ready to go!

[sydney-runkle]

@yezz123,

Thanks for your work on this docs refactor. I'd like to provide some more feedback on some of the changes, and a lot of them aren't relevant to fixing the docs build issue we ran into with 2.4.0. I've opened a PR here to fix those issues, then I'll address these changes early next week! #125

[sydney-runkle]

@yezz123,

Thanks for your work on this. I've left some general comments. Ping me once you'd like another review :).

[sydney-runkle]

Great, thanks!