Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyg-lib neighbor sampler integration #5388

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 8, 2022
Merged

pyg-lib neighbor sampler integration #5388

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 8, 2022

Conversation

rusty1s
Copy link
Member

@rusty1s rusty1s commented Sep 8, 2022

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the loader label Sep 8, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the loader label Sep 8, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5388 (b01f020) into master (40ad1af) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 80.76%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5388      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.38%   83.35%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       18745    18771      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        15630    15646      +16     
- Misses       3115     3125      +10     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/sampler/neighbor_sampler.py 90.90% <70.58%> (-9.10%) ⬇️
torch_geometric/loader/neighbor_loader.py 90.80% <100.00%> (ø)
torch_geometric/sampler/base.py 96.29% <100.00%> (+0.29%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@mananshah99 mananshah99 self-requested a review September 8, 2022 17:36
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit 005f993 into master Sep 8, 2022
@rusty1s rusty1s deleted the pyg_lib_sampler branch September 8, 2022 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants