Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added the ClusterPooling layer #9627

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thijssnelleman
Copy link
Contributor

Our method that we will present at ECML MLG workshop. Based on EdgePooling

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 76 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.21%. Comparing base (3f4f1a0) to head (a2dfc05).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
torch_geometric/nn/pool/cluster_pool.py 0.00% 76 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9627      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.96%   87.21%   +0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         468      481      +13     
  Lines       30918    31364     +446     
==========================================
+ Hits        26887    27355     +468     
+ Misses       4031     4009      -22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@wsad1 wsad1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work.
Could you add unit tests.

@rusty1s rusty1s changed the title Placing cluster_pool into package Added the ClusterPooling layer Sep 10, 2024
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit df3df3b into pyg-team:master Sep 10, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants