-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add examples for 'classic' causal inference datasets #44
Labels
Milestone
Comments
drbenvincent
added
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
outputs
Quantitative outputs of the model
labels
Nov 2, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 3, 2022
12 tasks
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2022
15 tasks
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2022
drbenvincent
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Suggestion by @juanitorduz... Rather than just applying the package to synthetic datasets, it would be good to apply the methods to classic datasets / causal inference problems. This also gives people some faith that the package produces sensible (or at least similar) results as other people's implementations.
Sources
RDD: drinking example
See https://matheusfacure.github.io/python-causality-handbook/16-Regression-Discontinuity-Design.html#
SC: Proposition 99 example
ITS: Add simple example to match the CausalImpact docs
its_pymc.ipynb
its_skl.ipynb
DiD: Add the 'bank failure' dataset + analyses
This will almost certainly require code changes. At the moment there is a hard wired constraint that there is just a single pre and post observation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: