[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' #4483

tim-s-ccs · 2024-07-18T10:24:29Z

setuptools version

setuptools>=71.0.0

Python version

Python 3.12

OS

Ubuntu

Additional environment information

I found this bug when running the test for the project in GitHub actions

Description

When I install the requirements in my Python package project (pip-sync requirements-dev.txt) I get an error within setuptools which says:

Preparing metadata (setup.py) ... error
error: subprocess-exited-with-error

× python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully.
...
TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero'

This error was caused by using setuptools >= 71.0.0

Not to speculate but it looks like the issue was introduced by this commit in setuptools: 00384a5

And this commit is including new changes from the packaging project and its this commit here where we can see the issue:
pypa/packaging@cc938f9
https://github.com/pypa/packaging/blame/4493dfcd95a893f676a7aa4bd17c547bea676371/src/packaging/utils.py#L58

Expected behavior

I would expect pip-sync requirements-dev.txt to run successfully

How to Reproduce

Clone https://github.com/tim-s-ccs/example-python-package.git
Make sure you are using Python 3.12 and you have pip-tools installed (pip install --upgrade pip wheel pip-tools)
Make sure you are using the correct version of setuptools pip install --upgrade setuptools==71.0.0
Run pip-compile requirements-dev.in

Output

    error: subprocess-exited-with-error
    
    × python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully.
    │ exit code: 1
    ╰─> [42 lines of output]
        running egg_info
        creating /private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info
        writing /private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info/PKG-INFO
        writing dependency_links to /private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
        writing top-level names to /private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info/top_level.txt
        writing manifest file '/private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
        reading manifest file '/private/var/folders/kt/n16_msf56_z3kfyb65l37wxhb_m4s_/T/pip-pip-egg-info-3sca_19y/example_python_package.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
        Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "<string>", line 2, in <module>
          File "<pip-setuptools-caller>", line 34, in <module>
          File "/Users/my.name/Code/test/example-python-package/setup.py", line 16, in <module>
            setup(
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 106, in setup
            return distutils.core.setup(**attrs)
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/core.py", line 184, in setup
            return run_commands(dist)
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/core.py", line 200, in run_commands
            dist.run_commands()
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 970, in run_commands
            self.run_command(cmd)
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 974, in run_command
            super().run_command(command)
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_distutils/dist.py", line 989, in run_command
            cmd_obj.run()
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/command/egg_info.py", line 321, in run
            self.find_sources()
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/command/egg_info.py", line 329, in find_sources
            mm.run()
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/command/egg_info.py", line 555, in run
            self.prune_file_list()
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/command/egg_info.py", line 621, in prune_file_list
            base_dir = self.distribution.get_fullname()
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_core_metadata.py", line 266, in get_fullname
            return _distribution_fullname(self.get_name(), self.get_version())
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
          File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/_core_metadata.py", line 284, in _distribution_fullname
            canonicalize_version(version, strip_trailing_zero=False),
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero'
        [end of output]
    
    note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/operations/build/metadata_legacy.py", line 64, in generate_metadata
    call_subprocess(
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/utils/subprocess.py", line 209, in call_subprocess
    raise error
pip._internal.exceptions.InstallationSubprocessError: python setup.py egg_info exited with 1

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/bin/pip-compile", line 8, in <module>
    sys.exit(cli())
             ^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1157, in __call__
    return self.main(*args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1078, in main
    rv = self.invoke(ctx)
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1434, in invoke
    return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click/core.py", line 783, in invoke
    return __callback(*args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click/decorators.py", line 33, in new_func
    return f(get_current_context(), *args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/piptools/scripts/compile.py", line 470, in cli
    results = resolver.resolve(max_rounds=max_rounds)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/piptools/resolver.py", line 604, in resolve
    is_resolved = self._do_resolve(
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/piptools/resolver.py", line 636, in _do_resolve
    resolver.resolve(
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/resolver.py", line 76, in resolve
    collected = self.factory.collect_root_requirements(root_reqs)
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/factory.py", line 538, in collect_root_requirements
    reqs = list(
           ^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/factory.py", line 494, in _make_requirements_from_install_req
    cand = self._make_base_candidate_from_link(
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/factory.py", line 210, in _make_base_candidate_from_link
    self._editable_candidate_cache[link] = EditableCandidate(
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 328, in __init__
    super().__init__(
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 158, in __init__
    self.dist = self._prepare()
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 235, in _prepare
    dist = self._prepare_distribution()
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/resolution/resolvelib/candidates.py", line 338, in _prepare_distribution
    return self._factory.preparer.prepare_editable_requirement(self._ireq)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/operations/prepare.py", line 698, in prepare_editable_requirement
    dist = _get_prepared_distribution(
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/operations/prepare.py", line 72, in _get_prepared_distribution
    abstract_dist.prepare_distribution_metadata(
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/distributions/sdist.py", line 69, in prepare_distribution_metadata
    self.req.prepare_metadata()
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/req/req_install.py", line 580, in prepare_metadata
    self.metadata_directory = generate_metadata_legacy(
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/my.name/.pyenv/versions/3.12.2/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pip/_internal/operations/build/metadata_legacy.py", line 71, in generate_metadata
    raise MetadataGenerationFailed(package_details=details) from error
pip._internal.exceptions.MetadataGenerationFailed: metadata generation failed

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Kaflak · 2024-07-18T11:54:23Z

Issue is visible when you use packaging<22.0

tonythomas01 · 2024-07-18T12:03:57Z

Could reproduce the same issue. Fixed by downgrading to 70.x

Kaflak · 2024-07-18T12:10:25Z

Also it can be fixed by update packaging to 22.0 or higher

jaraco · 2024-07-18T13:29:29Z

This behavior is by design. Similar to the issue reported in #4478, the new Setuptools 71 will prefer installed dependencies over the vendored ones. You'll want to either uninstall the older (incompatible) dependencies from the environment or install these dependencies. ~~You may be tempted to install setuptools[core], but please avoid doing that as core is an internal implementation detail.~~

mikealfare · 2024-07-18T14:01:23Z

This behavior is by design. Similar to the issue reported in #4478, the new Setuptools 71 will prefer installed dependencies over the vendored ones. You'll want to either uninstall the older (incompatible) dependencies from the environment or install these dependencies. You may be tempted to install setuptools[core], but please avoid doing that as core is an internal implementation detail.

Just to confirm, we're seeing this happen in this environment:

python -m pip install --upgrade pip
python -m pip install --upgrade setuptools wheel twine check-wheel-contents

Is that correct? It sounds like you're saying the issue is old dependencies existing in the environment, but we should have the most current packages here.

tim-s-ccs · 2024-07-18T14:19:40Z

Thanks @jaraco this was helpful. In my project where I was having the issue because on older version of packaging was a dependancy (not compatible with setuptools v71.0.0 or maybe earlier). Updating that dependancy did indeed fix the issue.

It's a bit annoying that the behaviour of setuptools changed which messed up my tests (which gets the latest version of setuptools when setting up) but that is very much my fault and not your teams.

Again, thanks for your comment as it helped my to understand the issue better and what the cause was.

For anyone who has a situation like me where my tests just started failing I'd check to make sure your dependancies and the dependancies of setuptools are compatible.

mikealfare · 2024-07-18T14:29:59Z

Thanks @jaraco this was helpful. In my project where I was having the issue because on older version of packaging was a dependancy (not compatible with setuptools v71.0.0 or maybe earlier). Updating that dependancy did indeed fix the issue.

It's a bit annoying that the behaviour of setuptools changed which messed up my tests (which gets the latest version of setuptools when setting up) but that is very much my fault and not your teams.

Again, thanks for your comment as it helped my to understand the issue better and what the cause was.

For anyone who has a situation like me where my tests just started failing I'd check to make sure your dependancies and the dependancies of setuptools are compatible.

Thanks for posting your solution. I'm trying to reason through how we're running into the same issue. We're not specifying packaging anywhere, so I would assume we would get the most current version. And when I install locally, I get the same version of packaging you specify in your PR. Perhaps the CI image I'm using already has packaging installed, but with an older version? I'll investigate and post back if I find something. But it would definitely be a sharp corner if pip install --upgrade setuptools no longer works on ubuntu-latest.

This is now necessary since `setuptools >= 71` started preferring externally present stdlib deps over the vendored ones. Refs: * pypa/setuptools#4457 * pypa/setuptools#4483 * pypa/setuptools#2825

jaraco · 2024-07-18T18:23:06Z

Perhaps the CI image I'm using already has packaging installed, but with an older version?

Yes, probably.

Thanks for posting your solution. I'm trying to reason through how we're running into the same issue. We're not specifying packaging anywhere, so I would assume we would get the most current version. And when I install locally, I get the same version of packaging you specify in your PR. Perhaps the CI image I'm using already has packaging installed, but with an older version? I'll investigate and post back if I find something. But it would definitely be a sharp corner if pip install --upgrade setuptools no longer works on ubuntu-latest.

Agreed, it is a bit of a sharp corner, and we made the major release as a signal of this shift in expectations. The issue is that while you're holding it correctly and pip install -U setuptools should theoretically upgrade all the required dependencies, it cannot currently due to the bootstrapping problem. I'm actively working on solving that issue, but in the meantime, one needs to pip install -U setuptools[core] to prepare an environment safely.

You may be tempted to install setuptools[core], but please avoid doing that as core is an internal implementation detail.

I think I may have been too cautious about this advice. We specifically want to avoid packages themselves making this declaration in build-requires. I believe it's safe to use in systems integration tooling.

mikealfare · 2024-07-18T19:03:58Z

@jaraco Thanks for taking the time to respond. This advice is super useful:

You may be tempted to install setuptools[core], but please avoid doing that as core is an internal implementation detail.

I think I may have been too cautious about this advice. We specifically want to avoid packages themselves making this declaration in build-requires. I believe it's safe to use in systems integration tooling.

The issue that we wound up running into is that older versions of our package actually take a runtime dependency on packaging. Upon verifying the package (by installing it), the version of packaging was getting clobbered. This was only causing an issue for the sdist, and not the wheel.

- python-Levenshtein insecure, upgraded to 0.12.1 - Upgrade setuptools==74.1.0 to address TypeError bug pypa/setuptools#4483 - Add ref value to django-uk-political-parties - - Address security risk in futures<0.18.2 and some flask versions GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq - Loosen versions of setuptools, werkzeug, click to address conflicts - Add certifi as a missing subdependency

py39 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4 that bundles setuptools 74.1.2) on Yoga, because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with the new setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. tox also needed to be capped (<4) as gate uses tox 3.28.0, but with capping virtualenv we pull in latest tox as well, which would cause other errors. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: I668557933c51123ce84275a0c718b6e79b3df174

py39 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4) on Yoga (which bundles setuptools), because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with newer setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. tox also needed to be capped (<4) as gate uses tox 3.28.0, but with capping virtualenv we pull in latest tox as well, which would cause other errors. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Closes-Bug: #2082234 Change-Id: I08e57e3b4c905bd679038c89185e54f6ab79738a

setuptools version is pinned to 70.3.0 to resolve an issue related to this ticket: pypa/setuptools#4483 pylint version is forced to >=3.3.0, where max-positional-arguments functionality has been added and max-positional-arguments is set to 16: pylint-dev/pylint#9842 Changes in functional test test_stateless_sec_group_list_find because sec group lists from a sec group can be ordered differently each time a request is sent to obtain them. Changed custom_mtu_size default value from 1350 to 1300 because some tests started failing on some jobs with: "Requested MTU is too big, maximum is 1314" Change-Id: Ie92d9a2f4e0dd08aeadfd720bdf4963b532decf3

Using setup.py to build and execute tests is no longer recommented, this change to python based dockerfiles uses `pip install .` to ensure the install process works and `unittest` to run the unit tests. Besides that, `packaging` had to be upgraded to become compatible with the setuptools>71, which breaks backwards compatibility (see pypa/setuptools#4483).

See pypa/setuptools#4483 (comment)

py39 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4) on Yoga (which bundles setuptools), because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with newer setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. tox also needed to be capped (<4) as gate uses tox 3.28.0, but with capping virtualenv we pull in latest tox as well, which would cause other errors. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: Icd7a5e7bb0941513e7ab5a778ee3811740f38028

py38 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4) on Yoga (which bundles setuptools), because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with newer setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. Note, that we also have to cap it explicitly, otherwise tox somehow pulls in latest setuptools. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: Id9e02f8b26bad5e2ef74908012de0b81898c04d0

py39 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4) on Yoga (which bundles setuptools), because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with newer setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. tox also needed to be capped (<4) as gate uses tox 3.28.0, but with capping virtualenv we pull in latest tox as well, which would cause other errors. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: Icd7a5e7bb0941513e7ab5a778ee3811740f38028 (cherry picked from commit 9bc2b3c)

py39 jobs (on ubuntu-focal) started to fail due to recent virtualenv release (20.26.4) on Yoga (which bundles setuptools), because we have 'packaging==21.3' in this branch that is not compatible with newer setuptools [1]. setuptools is bundled in virtualenv, so it has to be capped via the virtualenv package. tox also needed to be capped (<4) as gate uses tox 3.28.0, but with capping virtualenv we pull in latest tox as well, which would cause other errors. [1] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: I294f6715c41fd1651e92f41c6601880c19f442a7

ArslanKAS · 2024-10-23T01:36:52Z

Quote reply

Could reproduce the same issue. Fixed by downgrading to 70.x

You save me!!! all you need to do is upgrade to setuptools==70.0.0. Don't try > 74 or less than 70. None of them can work!!! Packaging I use is 24.1.

For me: pip3.10 install --upgrade setuptools==70.0.0

You can use: pip install --upgrade setuptools==70.0.0

Thanks it worked

NorseGaud · 2024-10-23T18:54:27Z

Why do I need to downgrade to 70.0.0? This is nuts...

jvaehsen-deloitte · 2024-10-24T06:04:22Z

Why do I need to downgrade to 70.0.0? This is nuts...

did you try this?
#4483 (comment)

mauvilsa · 2024-10-24T06:33:10Z

Downgrading setuptools or adding packaging with a specific version as a dependency are both weird. The docs just say that people need to add setuptools as a build dependency, nothing about packaging. If setuptools depends on packaging, and it is incompatible with older versions of packaging, then "packaging>=MIN_VERSION" should be a required dependency of setuptools, not in a core optional dependency recommended to not be used.

@jaraco how is this behavior "by design"? What I see in the docs does not help.

A recent release of setuptools breaks when packaging is <22.0 [0]. Because we can't reliably pin setuptools in the real world (we expect people to simple create a venv and pip install from there (with our without tools like tox) we update our stable constraint to 23.1 to match stable/2023.2 in order to get things working again. [0] pypa/setuptools#4483 Change-Id: If75a86941b636580b5220f9ea5fa80a12d1bf2e6

There is an incompatibility between packaging version from CentOS and setuptools from pip. Which causes a failure running the tests: TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' See also pypa/setuptools#4483 Fix this by using a the current packaging version instead of the CentOS packaged one. Signed-off-by: Jean-Louis Dupond <jean-louis@dupond.be>

pypa/setuptools#4483

tim-s-ccs added bug Needs Triage Issues that need to be evaluated for severity and status. labels Jul 18, 2024

mikealfare mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

Pin setuptools to address setuptools#4483 dbt-labs/dbt-snowflake#1124

Closed

4 tasks

jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024

Update changelog to reflect common experience seen in #4478 and #4483.

ea5ce1a

jaraco added wontfix and removed Needs Triage Issues that need to be evaluated for severity and status. labels Jul 18, 2024

This was referenced Jul 18, 2024

Pin setuptools to address setuptools#4483 dbt-labs/dbt-bigquery#1284

Closed

Pin setuptools to address setuptools#4483 dbt-labs/dbt-redshift#865

Closed

mikealfare mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

Pin setuptools to address setuptools#4483 dbt-labs/dbt-spark#1064

Closed

4 tasks

tim-s-ccs mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

Update the packaging version Crown-Commercial-Service/ccs-digitalmarketplace-apiclient#101

Merged

tim-s-ccs closed this as completed Jul 18, 2024

jaraco mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

Stop vendoring packages #2825

Open

MichelleArk mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

swap source dist install + check and wheel install + check in build packages step in main.yml dbt-labs/dbt-core#10463

Merged

5 tasks

webknjaz mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024

🧪 Use setuptools [core] @ collections_runtime_pythonpath ansible/ansible#83627

Merged

jaraco mentioned this issue Jul 20, 2024

[BUG] Using canonicalize_version from _vendor instead of extern breaks packages #4496

Closed

jaraco pinned this issue Jul 20, 2024

andy-maier mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2024

[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' with setuptools 71.x #4501

Closed

lpillmann mentioned this issue Sep 24, 2024

Pin setuptools version to <71 Gemma-Analytics/ewah#251

Merged

StephenCarlson mentioned this issue Sep 27, 2024

[BUG] install_gs.sh failing: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' svpcom/wfb-ng#373

Open

2 tasks

khoroshevskyi mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2024

error installing pararead databio/pararead#45

Closed

tamasgal added a commit to KM3NeT/km3pipe that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2024

Require package 22+

96eaf97

See pypa/setuptools#4483 (comment)

dtm2451 added a commit to mountetna/monoetna that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2024

lock down setuptools and packaging versions per pypa/setuptools#4483

6fe3589

magnesj mentioned this issue Oct 11, 2024

Not able to import latest rips version OPM/ResInsight#11772

Closed

zxiong mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2024

Fix building AppImage failure release-engineering/pubtools-sign#38

Merged

rweeber-coveo mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2024

Suggesting a fix to the platformclient so a region can be specified t… coveo/push-api-client.py#40

Open

leust mentioned this issue Oct 30, 2024

Update packaging constraint to match 2023.2 sapcc/requirements#92

Merged

aspeddro mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2024

[bugfix]: Update openpyxl and add upper limit for setuptools basedosdados/pipelines#884

Merged

kaw803 mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2024

18期向け WSL2, Ubuntu22.04 前提で環境構築手順を修正 hfujikawa77/droneschool-doc#5

Merged

DJTaichi mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2024

pip install -e . Error haotian-liu/LLaVA#1755

Open

dupondje mentioned this issue Nov 7, 2024

tests: add dep on packaging in tox oVirt/vdsm#423

Open

bahill added a commit to DataBiosphere/hca-ingest that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2024

limit the version of setuptools

ff19e9a

pypa/setuptools#4483

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' #4483

[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' #4483

tim-s-ccs commented Jul 18, 2024

Kaflak commented Jul 18, 2024

tonythomas01 commented Jul 18, 2024

Kaflak commented Jul 18, 2024

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

tim-s-ccs commented Jul 18, 2024

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

ArslanKAS commented Oct 23, 2024

NorseGaud commented Oct 23, 2024

jvaehsen-deloitte commented Oct 24, 2024

mauvilsa commented Oct 24, 2024

[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' #4483

[BUG] TypeError: canonicalize_version() got an unexpected keyword argument 'strip_trailing_zero' #4483

Comments

tim-s-ccs commented Jul 18, 2024

setuptools version

Python version

OS

Additional environment information

Description

Expected behavior

How to Reproduce

Output

Kaflak commented Jul 18, 2024

tonythomas01 commented Jul 18, 2024

Kaflak commented Jul 18, 2024

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 • edited Loading

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

tim-s-ccs commented Jul 18, 2024

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 • edited Loading

mikealfare commented Jul 18, 2024

ArslanKAS commented Oct 23, 2024

NorseGaud commented Oct 23, 2024

jvaehsen-deloitte commented Oct 24, 2024

mauvilsa commented Oct 24, 2024

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading