-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pypeit_chk_flexure #1844
pypeit_chk_flexure #1844
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1844 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 38.21% 38.18% -0.03%
===========================================
Files 208 209 +1
Lines 48419 48487 +68
===========================================
+ Hits 18504 18516 +12
- Misses 29915 29971 +56 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Three requests/questions:
- Add a comment in the release doc
- Can we use
msgs.info
instead ofprint
? - Is it necessary to collect and return the tables from all the input files?
-Thanks @kbwestfall for the reminder to add to the release doc (I always forget!)
|
@kbwestfall I followed your suggestion to move the flexure checking code to a function that is then called by |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for these updates!
Thanks @badpandabear and @kbwestfall for the quick reviews. I'm merging now. |
As title. New simple script to check the flexure (both spatial and spectral) applied to the science data.
Some examples of how the script works: