Binary pattern match Based Mustache template engine for Erlang/OTP.
- Binary pattern match based mustache template engine for Erlang/OTP.
- Do not use a regular expression !!
- Support maps and associative arrays.
A logic-less templates.
$ git clone git://github.com/soranoba/bbmustache.git
$ cd bbmustache
$ make start
Erlang/OTP 17 [erts-6.3] [source-f9282c6] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:true]
Eshell V6.3 (abort with ^G)
1> {ok,[bbmustache]}
1> bbmustache:render(<<"{{name}}">>, #{"name" => "hoge"}).
<<"hoge">>
2> bbmustache:render(<<"{{name}}">>, [{"name", "hoge"}]).
<<"hoge">>
Add the following settings.
%% rebar (rebar.config)
{deps,
[
{bbmustache, ".*", {git, "git://github.com/soranoba/bbmustache.git", {branch, "master"}}}
]}.
%% rebar3 (rebar.config)
{deps, [bbmustache]}.
If you don't use the rebar and use the OTP17 or later, this library should be compile with -Dnamespaced_types
.
Map (R17 or later)
1> bbmustache:render(<<"{{name}}">>, #{"name" => "hoge"}).
<<"hoge">>
2> Template1 = bbmustache:parse_binary(<<"{{name}}">>).
...
3> bbmustache:compile(Template1, #{"name" => "hoge"}).
<<"hoge">>
4> Template2 = bbmustache:parse_file(<<"./hoge.mustache">>).
...
5> bbmustache:compile(Template2, #{"name" => "hoge"}).
<<"hoge">>
Associative array
1> bbmustache:render(<<"{{name}}">>, [{"name", "hoge"}]).
<<"hoge">>
2> Template1 = bbmustache:parse_binary(<<"{{name}}">>).
...
3> bbmustache:compile(Template1, [{"name", "hoge"}]).
<<"hoge">>
4> Template2 = bbmustache:parse_file(<<"./hoge.mustache">>).
...
5> bbmustache:compile(Template2, [{"name", "hoge"}]).
<<"hoge">>
Please refer to the man page and the spec of mustache as the need arises.
Please see this for a list of features that bbmustache supports.
%% please use {{{tag}}}
1> bbmustache:render(<<"<h1>{{{tag}}}</h1>">>, #{"tag" => "I like Erlang & mustache"}).
<<"<h1>I like Erlang & mustache</h1>">>
1> bbmustache:render(<<"{{=<< >>=}} <<tag>>, <<={{ }}=>> {{tag}}">>, #{"tag" => "hi"}).
<<" hi, hi">>
1> bbmustache:render(<<"{{tag}}">>, #{tag => "hi"}, [{key_type, atom}]).
<<"hi">>
- Lambda expression is included wasted processing.
- Because it is optimized to
parse_string/1
+compile/2
.
Benchmarks and check the reference implementation
Pull request is welcome =D