-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reduce allocations #855
Merged
Merged
Reduce allocations #855
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The speedup it pretty amazing ;-) |
ok, I'll update the pr to fix set too :) |
Forgot to do this when I switched away from an StlCompatAllocator, so we were leaking memory pretty badly.
- Check for the allocation of empty tuples and just return the singleton - Try to avoid creating the kwargs dict since it might end up being empty - Let unicode-creation special case apply to all argument types - Fix type(obj) to be fast again (got superceded by a different special case) - Do fewer allocations in int()
This is a temporary fix for the fact that "-1" is currently getting parsed as "-(1)", which will cause us to call '(1).__neg__()' with the associated overhead and allocation. It should be useful even after that gets fixed though.
Reduces boxing during the import process
For some reason CPython allocates an extra "item" for generic variable-sized objects, but it looks like it doesn't do that for tuples. We had been doing that, so let's try not doing that and saving 8 bytes per tuple.
Hmm spoke a bit too soon; after fixing some bugs the effects are about half what they were at first :/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spent some time looking into it since GC time is showing up pretty high on the django benchmarks.
This PR reduces django_template3 bytes allocated by about 20%, leading to about a 3% improvement on that benchmark, and about 2% overall (geomean).