Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow passing config_file objects instead of always assuming we have a config.json file #390

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 24, 2017

Conversation

dan-blanchard
Copy link
Member

This is mostly done for weird cases like having your config stored inside a wheel that you need to access with a resource_stream.

@dan-blanchard dan-blanchard force-pushed the feature/pass_config_file_object branch 2 times, most recently from b7328b7 to 5248db0 Compare August 24, 2017 21:06
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 47.388% when pulling 5248db0 on feature/pass_config_file_object into fcb5c2c on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 47.388% when pulling 5248db0 on feature/pass_config_file_object into fcb5c2c on master.

@dan-blanchard dan-blanchard merged commit ee50169 into master Aug 24, 2017
@dan-blanchard dan-blanchard deleted the feature/pass_config_file_object branch August 24, 2017 23:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants