Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix finding pthread_*name_np on vanilla musl libc #2939

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

mgorny
Copy link
Contributor

@mgorny mgorny commented Jan 29, 2024

Fix the pthread_getname_np and pthread_setname_np search logic to support vanilla versions of musl and CPython, e.g. as used on Gentoo musl systems. On such systems, there is no "libpthread.so" (there is only a static library) and the relevant functions are found in "libc.so". Additionally, ctypes.util.find_library("c") does not work because of an old unsolved bug in CPython (linked in the code).

To resolve the problem, add a fallback to trying libc.so if no pthread library can be found. This roughly covers three possibilities:

  • a "typical" system with libpthread.so will find that library and use it

  • a musl system will fall back to libc.so, load that library and find pthread functions there

  • any other system will try to load libc.so, and fail

The code in get_os_thread_name_func() remains fully relaxed, allowing either CDLL construction (i.e. finding the library) to fail, or the library not to contain pthread_setname_np.

The code in test_threads.py was made more relaxed — rather than skipping if libpthread.so does not exist, it tries to load libc.so as a fallback, and skips if that fails.

Originally reported as https://bugs.gentoo.org/923257.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (05c5df2) 99.64% compared to head (c8c1957) 99.64%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2939   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.64%   99.64%           
=======================================
  Files         116      116           
  Lines       17503    17506    +3     
  Branches     3148     3148           
=======================================
+ Hits        17441    17444    +3     
  Misses         43       43           
  Partials       19       19           
Files Coverage Δ
src/trio/_core/_thread_cache.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/trio/_tests/test_threads.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@A5rocks
Copy link
Contributor

A5rocks commented Jan 29, 2024

I ran into this for #2933 and ended up just making that require musl-dev instead of figuring this out. Thanks for putting in the work!

src/trio/_tests/test_threads.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Fix the `pthread_getname_np` and `pthread_setname_np` search logic
to support vanilla versions of musl and CPython, e.g. as used on Gentoo
musl systems.  On such systems, there is no "libpthread.so" (there is
only a static library) and the relevant functions are found
in "libc.so".  Additionally, `ctypes.util.find_library("c")` does not
work because of an old unsolved bug in CPython (linked in the code).

To resolve the problem, add a fallback to trying `libc.so` if no pthread
library can be found.  This roughly covers three possibilities:

- a "typical" system with `libpthread.so` will find that library
  and use it

- a musl system will fall back to `libc.so`, load that library and find
  pthread functions there

- any other system will try to load `libc.so`, and fail

The code in `get_os_thread_name_func()` remains fully relaxed, allowing
either CDLL construction (i.e. finding the library) to fail,
or the library not to contain `pthread_setname_np`.

The code in `test_threads.py` was made more relaxed — rather than
skipping if `libpthread.so` does not exist, it tries to load `libc.so`
as a fallback, and skips if that fails.

Originally reported as https://bugs.gentoo.org/923257.
@mgorny
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgorny commented Jan 29, 2024

Fixed and added a newsfragment.

Copy link
Member

@CoolCat467 CoolCat467 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seeing this and your description, this makes sense and I think it looks good!

@A5rocks A5rocks mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2024
@jakkdl jakkdl merged commit 7cb15ea into python-trio:master Jan 30, 2024
29 checks passed
@trio-bot
Copy link

trio-bot bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Hey @mgorny, it looks like that was the first time we merged one of your PRs! Thanks so much! 🎉 🎂

If you want to keep contributing, we'd love to have you. So, I just sent you an invitation to join the python-trio organization on Github! If you accept, then here's what will happen:

  • Github will automatically subscribe you to notifications on all our repositories. (But you can unsubscribe again if you don't want the spam.)

  • You'll be able to help us manage issues (add labels, close them, etc.)

  • You'll be able to review and merge other people's pull requests

  • You'll get a [member] badge next to your name when participating in the Trio repos, and you'll have the option of adding your name to our member's page and putting our icon on your Github profile (details)

If you want to read more, here's the relevant section in our contributing guide.

Alternatively, you're free to decline or ignore the invitation. You'll still be able to contribute as much or as little as you like, and I won't hassle you about joining again. But if you ever change your mind, just let us know and we'll send another invitation. We'd love to have you, but more importantly we want you to do whatever's best for you.

If you have any questions, well... I am just a humble Python script, so I probably can't help. But please do post a comment here, or in our chat, or on our forum, whatever's easiest, and someone will help you out!

@mgorny mgorny deleted the musl branch January 30, 2024 14:23
@mgorny
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgorny commented Jan 30, 2024

Thanks!

@jakkdl
Copy link
Member

jakkdl commented Jan 30, 2024

Thank you for the contribution!
Can also see that it works in CI over in #2933
https://github.com/python-trio/trio/actions/runs/7712303460/job/21019556518?pr=2933

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants