Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-99908: Tutorial: Modernize the 'data-record class' example #100499

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 24, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 15 additions & 9 deletions Doc/tutorial/classes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -738,18 +738,24 @@ Odds and Ends
=============

Sometimes it is useful to have a data type similar to the Pascal "record" or C
"struct", bundling together a few named data items. An empty class definition
will do nicely::
"struct", bundling together a few named data items. The idiomatic approach
AlexWaygood marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
is to use :mod:`dataclasses` for this purpose::

class Employee:
pass
from dataclasses import dataclasses

john = Employee() # Create an empty employee record
@dataclass
class Employee:
name: str
dept: str
salary: int

# Fill the fields of the record
john.name = 'John Doe'
john.dept = 'computer lab'
john.salary = 1000
::

>>> john = Employee('john', 'computer lab', 1000)
>>> john.dept
'computer lab'
>>> john.salary
1000

A piece of Python code that expects a particular abstract data type can often be
passed a class that emulates the methods of that data type instead. For
Expand Down