Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve grammar/fix missing word #102060

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/bugs.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Click on the "New issue" button in the top bar to report a new issue.
The submission form has two fields, "Title" and "Comment".

For the "Title" field, enter a *very* short description of the problem;
less than ten words is good.
fewer than ten words is good.

In the "Comment" field, describe the problem in detail, including what you
expected to happen and what did happen. Be sure to include whether any
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/howto/logging-cookbook.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2538,7 +2538,7 @@ should be logged, or the ``extra`` keyword parameter to indicate additional
contextual information to be added to the log). So you cannot directly make
logging calls using :meth:`str.format` or :class:`string.Template` syntax,
because internally the logging package uses %-formatting to merge the format
string and the variable arguments. There would no changing this while preserving
string and the variable arguments. There would be no changing this while preserving
backward compatibility, since all logging calls which are out there in existing
code will be using %-format strings.

Expand Down