Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.11] Improve test coverage for is_typeddict (GH-104884) #104888

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2023

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

In particular, it's important to test that is_typeddict(TypedDict)
returns False.
(cherry picked from commit 1497607)

Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com

In particular, it's important to test that is_typeddict(TypedDict)
returns False.
(cherry picked from commit 1497607)

Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2023 18:47
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-assigned this May 24, 2023
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 5e91167 into python:3.11 May 24, 2023
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-1497607-3.11 branch May 24, 2023 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip issue skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants