-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-91404: Improve re
performance
#91495
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
89e4e5e
Try out computed gotos in the regex engine
brandtbucher bc378d8
Reduce indirection
brandtbucher fa98784
More of that
brandtbucher 48a7f1c
Rearrange some stuff
brandtbucher 6f8a9a0
Whitespace
brandtbucher 03d3194
Generate sre_targets.h
brandtbucher 24fa5a1
Catch up with main
brandtbucher 0d30328
blurb add
brandtbucher fdcde9f
fixup
brandtbucher d38743f
What's New
brandtbucher File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-04-12-19-08-13.gh-issue-91404.zjqYHo.rst
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
Improve the performance of :mod:`re` matching by using computed gotos (or | ||
"threaded code") on supported platforms and removing expensive pointer | ||
indirections. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add that it speeds up matching by 10-20%.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't. These claimed speedups are highly misleading.
The release notes for 3.9 and 3.10 have various claimed large speedups, yet 3.9 is no faster than 3.8 and 3.10 only a little bit faster.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The benchmark results are convincing to me.
Without this it is not clear why bother with making this change at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You'll only see a 10-20% speedup for these specific benchmarks, which are contrived.
Real programs, even those that spend a lot regexes will spend a much lower proportion of their time in the regex library.
Any number we give will be misleading.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This branch vs 3.10:
(Those numbers are very close to what you get by combining the latest
re
perf regressions with the numbers from this PR.)I'll just leave the NEWS entry as-is (very few people read it anyways). I don't have a strong opinion on what should go in What's New (but @pablogsal might).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps the wording "up to 10% faster on the
pyperformance
regular expression benchmarks" (or similar) might suffice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should indeed go in the What's new. Could you add a small sentence in the Performance section, maybe? Specifying that the improvement is in the re engine and that it only affects re operations? If we need to remove it later is easier than the risk of forgetting to add something.